Posts Tagged ‘the-government’

Government faces heat on fuel poverty

Tuesday, June 9th, 2009

Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2009/jun/10/fuel-poverty-energy

Select committee claims ministers are failing millions of vulnerable families and demands urgent action on fuel poverty

The government was today urged to offer more help to the millions of families in fuel poverty due to rising energy prices.

The Environment, Food and Rural Affairs select committee said ministers had failed to meet statutory obligations to end fuel poverty and called on them to set up an action plan to help people struggling with energy bills as a matter of urgency.

It warned the resources available for tackling fuel poverty were “inadequate and getting worse”. Anyone spending at least 10% of their income on heating and lighting their home is deemed to be living in fuel poverty. In a series of recommendations, the select committee called for the winter fuel payment to be no longer given to people paying higher-rate tax. Instead it wants the money to fund energy efficiency programmes aimed at helping the fuel poor and vulnerable households.

It also called on the government to consolidate its range of energy efficiency programmes into one comprehensive scheme to upgrade all homes in England, with the improvements delivered by local authorities.

Committee chairman Michael Jack, said: “We need action and clarity – not further consultation – to tackle the three elements that drive fuel poverty: prices, income and energy efficiency levels.

“The government must act swiftly to bring forward practical measures before next winter, using technologies that are already well understood, to help the millions of households that remain in fuel poverty.”

The committee said the Warm Front programme, the government’s main scheme to help vulnerable households cut their energy bills, should have its budget increased and that it should be extended to include all hard-to-treat properties.

It recommended a central budget be created into which energy companies pay their carbon emissions reduction target contributions, so the cash could be pooled with money from other programmes to fund home upgrades.

Energy regulator Ofgem should be ordered to ensure energy companies tell customers about social tariffs and who is eligible for them, to help increase competition for certain customers, such as those who use pre-payment meters, it said.

Jonathan Stearn, energy expert for Consumer Focus, said it was “outrageous” that there were still more than 5 million vulnerable households struggling to afford to heat and power their homes.

He added: “The government’s energy efficiency schemes are simply not up to scratch. Immediate investment is needed in a radical and co-ordinated action plan if we are to lift millions of the poorest pensioners, families and disabled people out of fuel poverty and cut carbon emissions.”

Michelle Mitchell, charity director for Age Concern and Help the Aged, said: “The report sounds a loud wake-up call for the government, whose strategy to tackle fuel poverty is miles away from reaching its targets.

“Ministers should immediately set out to implement the committee’s recommendations, reviewing the Warm Front Scheme and producing a new ‘road map’ to bring home a more ambitious energy efficiency plan.

“Focusing the winter fuel payment on fuel-poor households could give an edge to the government’s strategy to tackle fuel poverty, as long as the system required to implement it is simple and workable.”

Campaigners say the number of householders in fuel poverty has been one of Labour’s greatest failures. In March last year, its own advisers, the Fuel Poverty Advisory Group, said the government appeared to have given up trying to hit its legally binding target to reduce fuel poverty. The group criticised ministers for cutting the grants programme aimed at those in fuel poverty by a quarter during the comprehensive spending review.

This, it said, was despite the Treasury receiving significantly higher VAT receipts on the back of gas and electricity prices which have doubled in recent years.

  • Energy bills
  • Household bills
  • Poverty
  • Consumer affairs
guardian.co.uk ? Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Should companies be forced to allow home working?

Wednesday, May 13th, 2009

Is it time for the government to force managers to offer employees the flexibility to work from home?

Smart meters for all homes

Monday, May 11th, 2009

Suppliers and customers will save up to £3.6bn over 20 years as electricity is used more efficiently and estimated bills eliminated

Every home in the UK must be fitted with a “smart meter” by 2020 to reduce energy use and eliminate estimated bills, under plans revealed by the government today.

The new meters track real-time energy usage and send data about consumption in households and small businesses direct to utility companies. They could save suppliers and customers £2.5-£3.6bn over the next 20 years, according to the government, but will cost more than double this to install.

Launching a new consultation today on how the smart meters should be introduced, the Department for Energy and Climate Change (Decc) claimed the compulsory scheme will be the biggest electricity and gas smart metering project in the world.

Ed Miliband, the energy and climate change secretary, said: “The meters most of us have in our homes were designed for a different age, before climate change. Now we need to get smarter with our energy. This is a big project affecting 26 million homes, and several million businesses, so it’s important we design a system that brings best value to everyone involved.”

The cost of replacing today’s meters by the end of 2020 is expected to reach £8.11bn under the government’s preferred plan, with utility companies paying for new equipment and installation. Although they may pass on that cost to consumers through higher tariffs, the Energy Retail Association — which represents the major electricity and gas companies — said that smart meters will be “cost-neutral” to customers because of savings to its members through the abolition of meter reading and bill estimation costs.

Smart meters will not only see the end of meter readers and estimated bills, but could make it easier for utilities to offer sophisticated Economy 7-style tariffs based on what time of day energy is used. Such “demand management” could theoretically smooth out electricity demand , reducing the number of energy-wasting power stations currently on standby to cope with sudden peaks in demand. EDF said in a statement that smart meters will enable it to offer new pricing structures to support energy efficiency.

Three plans are under consideration for how the smart meters should be introduced. The first sees utilities take on all aspects of smart metering including installations and data management, a second — the government’s preferred model — has energy suppliers responsible for installation and maintenance, but with a third party handling the energy data and communication. A third “fully centralised” scenario envisages setting up a new organisation, separate from government and the utilities, to oversee the installation of the smart meters and data management. That new agency would be coordinated nationally, with regional franchises installing the equipment.

Phil Bentley, managing director of British Gas, said: “Smart meters will lead to the single greatest revolution in energy use since British Gas converted all the nation’s homes to natural gas in the 1970s. We have the largest smart meter trial in the country, and we know this technology has helped put our customers back in control of their energy usage, helping them use less energy, cut carbon emissions and save money.

“Smart meters will also ensure our homes are as energy efficient as possible, and they will open the gateway to new technologies for renewable electricity generation in the home — and the ’smart grid’ of the future.”

Garry Felgate, chief executive of the Energy Retail Association, said: “We’re delighted that the government has finally announced its commitment to enable energy companies to put smart meters in every home. Quite simply keeping your existing meters is like sending a telegram instead of installing wireless broadband. However, we are still waiting for more detail on the meters themselves and the timetable for the project.”

The exact features of the smart meters will be decided during the consultation over the next three months. The government’s proposals say that, in addition to sending data to utilities, the meters should be ready to work with real-time displays — wireless screens showing energy use that can be placed in a living room or around the house.

Smart meters should also be able to “dynamically” manage the electricity used by domestic appliances. This could mean switching off refrigerators for a few minutes at times of high demand, or charging up electric vehicles at night when demand is low. A government report last year suggested such technology, which would smooth out national peaks and troughs in electricity use, could save 2 million tonnes of CO2 a year.

Smart meter trials are already under way around the country through energy companies including British Gas and Npower, and smaller suppliers such as First Utility already supply smart meters as standard. The first smart meters installed under the government’s new plans are expected to arrive in homes and businesses in 2012.

  • Energy
  • Energy efficiency
  • Carbon emissions
  • Energy bills
  • Household bills
  • Consumer affairs
  • Home improvements
guardian.co.uk ? Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Tea and toilets order for railway stations

Tuesday, May 5th, 2009

Railway stations are to be ordered to keep toilets clean and offer refreshments to passengers.

Lord Adonis, the rail minister, has set up a review of stations following a six-day rail tour of Britain with low points including a tea drought at Southampton station.

He said: “The quality of stations is extremely variable and, at many major stations, the service level is often downright poor. I experienced stations where toilet facilities were closed or uncleaned, where there was a lack of refreshments or adequate bicycle or car parking facilities.”

Minimum standards for keeping toilets open and offering passengers food and drink will be written into new franchise agreements, he told the National Rail Conference in London. He announced the appointment of two “stations champions” to review services in England and Wales. Sir Peter Hall, president of the Town and Country Planning Association, and Chris Green, non-executive director of Network Rail, will make recommendations for ­station improvements.

Adonis said: “I don’t have unreasonable expectations for stations, but it is perfectly reasonable that they should be offering essential services.”

Network Rail, owner of Britain’s rail infrastructure, is spending £150m on improving 150 stations and the government is planning a multimillion pound investment in ticket gates. Fare dodgers are believed to cost the industry 5% of its annual revenues – about £270m.

  • Transport
  • Transport policy
  • Rail travel
  • Consumer affairs
guardian.co.uk ? Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Ombudsman to criticise Equitable Life compensation plan

Tuesday, May 5th, 2009

Ombusdman to use ‘nuclear option’ in rare public dressing down over government’s handling of compensation for Equitable Life policyholders

A parliamentary watchdog will today add to the government’s woes by giving ministers a rare public dressing down for defying her calls for proper compensation for Equitable Life policyholders.

It is understood the parliamentary ombudsman, Ann Abraham, is laying a special report before MPs this afternoon in which she will criticise the government for rejecting many of her recommendations relating to its handling of the problems at Equitable Life.

This is only the fifth time in 40 years that the ombudsman has published one of these so-called “section 10(3)” reports, which are described by some as the “nuclear option”, available to the watchdog when it is totally dissatisfied with a public body’s response to its findings. Previous 10(3) reports have led to the government implementing recommendations it had previously rejected. The contents of Abraham’s report are expected to be made public tomorrow morning.

A million customers saw their retirement savings slashed when Equitable was plunged into chaos by a court ruling in 2000 that the insurer must honour guarantees it had made to pension investors.

Campaigners have long battled for compensation, and last year it looked as if the government would have to pay out billions of pounds when Abraham said she had found evidence of “serial regulatory failure” by the government departments and watchdogs that were supposed to be protecting the insurer’s customers.

Treasury minister Yvette Cooper later apologised for the “maladministration” that led to the insurer’s near collapse but rejected calls for the government to offer compensation to all Equitable members.

A retired judge has been appointed to work out which policyholders have been hardest hit and what proportion of their losses can be attributed to maladministration.

MPs on the Commons public administration committee have already slammed the government for the “shabby, constitutionally dubious and proccedurally improper” way it responded to Abraham’s original report.

In January, Abraham said she was entitled to lay a special report before parliament “if, after conducting an investigation, it appears to me that injustice has been caused in consequence of maladministration and that this injustice has not been, or will not be, remedied”.

She added: “It is clear to me that the nature of the government’s response to my report means the injustice that I have found resulted from maladministration will not in every case be remedied – nor in any case will it be remedied fully.”

  • Equitable Life
  • Pensions
  • Insurance
  • Investments
guardian.co.uk ? Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds