Posts Tagged ‘guardian-news’

Fear of pension crisis grows as workers raid savings

Wednesday, June 10th, 2009

Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2009/jun/10/hsbc-pensions-survey

International survey suggests more than 20% are dipping into nest-eggs to pay down debt

More than 20% of the world’s workers have dipped into their savings to pay down debt and 13% have stopped saving altogether, according to a study of retirement trends over the past year.

In Britain, China, India and the US, the study suggests, savings have taken a back seat to maintaining living standards threatened by the global downturn.

According to research by HSBC, almost nine out of 10 people feel they are unprepared for retirement, and three-quarters do not know what income they can expect when they stop working.

Even in countries where the population is relatively young, there is a degree of panic among legislators keen to prepare for the day when over-65s outnumber schoolchildren. According to HSBC’s head of insurance, Clive Bannister, China is drafting plans for a nationwide scheme based on an occupational pension model established in Hong Kong. At the moment, most Chinese workers fall outside the limited number of occupational schemes and must rely for a retirement income on younger family members or their own small savings.

Last year, Britain reached the point at which 65-year-olds outnumbered 16-year-olds.

Bannister said the report, which was based on interviews with 15,000 people in 15 countries, showed there was a “downturn deficit” that the state alone could not solve. He said: “the recession means that people are worrying more about surviving from day-to-day than they are concerned about the future”.

He added that the situation in fast-growing economies such as India and China was more difficult. “We can see the state retreating across the globe as the number of older people increases quite dramatically. There simply won’t be enough workers to support a retired population through taxation. In emerging economies, falling state benefits means that, more than elsewhere, individuals must look after themselves.”

The last six months has seen a severe downturn in projections for retirement savings after a torrid two years for world stock markets and steep declines in interest rates. The problem is compounded by increases in life expectancy in most countries that mean pension planning must be extended to cope with a longer retirement.

Several countries, including Britain, have sought to raise the retirement age, but the burden of working longer has, in the main, been shifted by the current generation of over-50s to younger workers.

Previous HSBC studies have shown that workers from China to Britain expect to work beyond the age when they receive state pensions. But while many workers will remain fit enough to keep working into their 70s, others will find that they are unable to carry on and could fall into poverty.

The reluctance to save in the downturn adds to the “unpreparedness gap” being felt in every major economy, the bank said.

Stephen Green, the bank’s chairman, said: “A perfect storm is confronting pensions planning, created by an ageing population, falling pension fund values, a drop in state and employer contributions and an economic downturn which is forcing people to make financial choices.”

Green wants governments to support education schemes and financial advice centres for workers to make informed choices about their retirement planning.

  • Pensions
  • Occupational pensions
  • State pensions
  • Financial crisis
  • Global recession
  • HSBC
guardian.co.uk ? Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

House prices buoyed by property shortage

Tuesday, June 9th, 2009

Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2009/jun/09/rics-house-prices

A combination of rising buyer inquiries and a shortage of homes for sale is supporting house prices, Rics says

Increasing interest from new buyers plus a shortage of properties for sale is helping to stabilise house prices, according to the latest housing market survey from the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (Rics).

Rics’s members said buyer inquiries increased for the seventh month in a row in May, and at the fastest rate since 1999. Estate agents also saw a rise in sales, albeit from very depressed levels. The average number of properties sold over the past three months rose to 11.8, up from 10.6. Fewer surveyors also reported a fall in house prices.

At the same time new instructions have continued to fall: the average number of properties on estate agents’ books has dropped in the past month to 58.4 from 69.4, and by more than a third over the past year.

Rics said the lack of new supply coupled with the increase in activity is providing some support for house prices, but warned there could be further price falls to come. Spokesman Ian Perry said: “The housing market does appear to be close to bottoming out with activity picking up in a material way and prices at last stabilising.

“However, it is important to remember that the lack of supply has been as important in underpinning prices as the rise in demand. Moreover, with the economic backdrop still quite uncertain, unemployment set to continue increasing sharply and finance for first-time buyers still in short supply, there are a number of significant obstacles for the market to overcome over the coming months.”

The findings from Rics were supported by house price figures published today by the government’s communities department , which showed prices rose by 1.1% month-on-month in April, after dropping 1.3% in March. This means the year-on-year fall in house prices narrowed to 13% in April from 13.6% in March.

In London, the improving market is being driven by first-time buyers who have built up equity over the past two years, or who have been lent deposits by their parents, taking advantage of lower prices, according to estate agent Ludlow Thompson.

Director, Stephen Ludlow, said: “Sentiment has changed considerably – at the end of last year nobody could see a floor for prices. Whilst prices may not have reached the very bottom buyers are no longer worried that the market is still in meltdown mode.

“The pickup in demand in May was so sudden that it has been the lack of supply of properties actually on the market that caused the bounce in prices. We’ve had to move lettings staff on to sales to deal with the surge in activity.”

However, Howard Archer, chief UK and European economist for IHS Global Insight, said he remained sceptical that house prices had bottomed out.

“It is not uncommon for there to be months of rising prices when house prices are still trending down. Most recently, the Halifax reported that house prices rose by 2% month-on-month in January but then fell sharply during February-April before rising again in May.

“Housing market activity is still very low by past norms and at a level consistent with falling house prices, and despite markedly rising buyer interest we believe that the pickup in actual house purchases is likely to be gradual and fitful for some time to come.”

  • House prices
  • Property
  • First-time buyers
  • Housing market
guardian.co.uk ? Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

House prices buoyed by property shortage

Tuesday, June 9th, 2009

Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2009/jun/09/rics-house-prices

A combination of rising buyer inquiries and a shortage of homes for sale is supporting house prices, Rics says

Increasing interest from new buyers plus a shortage of properties for sale is helping to stabilise house prices, according to the latest housing market survey from the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (Rics).

Rics’s members said buyer inquiries increased for the seventh month in a row in May, and at the fastest rate since 1999. Estate agents also saw a rise in sales, albeit from very depressed levels. The average number of properties sold over the past three months rose to 11.8, up from 10.6. Fewer surveyors also reported a fall in house prices.

At the same time new instructions have continued to fall: the average number of properties on estate agents’ books has dropped in the past month to 58.4 from 69.4, and by more than a third over the past year.

Rics said the lack of new supply coupled with the increase in activity is providing some support for house prices, but warned there could be further price falls to come. Spokesman Ian Perry said: “The housing market does appear to be close to bottoming out with activity picking up in a material way and prices at last stabilising.

“However, it is important to remember that the lack of supply has been as important in underpinning prices as the rise in demand. Moreover, with the economic backdrop still quite uncertain, unemployment set to continue increasing sharply and finance for first-time buyers still in short supply, there are a number of significant obstacles for the market to overcome over the coming months.”

The findings from Rics were supported by house price figures published today by the government’s communities department , which showed prices rose by 1.1% month-on-month in April, after dropping 1.3% in March. This means the year-on-year fall in house prices narrowed to 13% in April from 13.6% in March.

In London, the improving market is being driven by first-time buyers who have built up equity over the past two years, or who have been lent deposits by their parents, taking advantage of lower prices, according to estate agent Ludlow Thompson.

Director, Stephen Ludlow, said: “Sentiment has changed considerably – at the end of last year nobody could see a floor for prices. Whilst prices may not have reached the very bottom buyers are no longer worried that the market is still in meltdown mode.

“The pickup in demand in May was so sudden that it has been the lack of supply of properties actually on the market that caused the bounce in prices. We’ve had to move lettings staff on to sales to deal with the surge in activity.”

However, Howard Archer, chief UK and European economist for IHS Global Insight, said he remained sceptical that house prices had bottomed out.

“It is not uncommon for there to be months of rising prices when house prices are still trending down. Most recently, the Halifax reported that house prices rose by 2% month-on-month in January but then fell sharply during February-April before rising again in May.

“Housing market activity is still very low by past norms and at a level consistent with falling house prices, and despite markedly rising buyer interest we believe that the pickup in actual house purchases is likely to be gradual and fitful for some time to come.”

  • House prices
  • Property
  • First-time buyers
  • Housing market
guardian.co.uk ? Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Ikea destroyed my credit cards

Friday, June 5th, 2009

Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2009/jun/05/ikea-credit-cards-policy

I lost my cards and arranged to collect them. So why did Ikea destroy them, costing me a fortune?

In early April I left my wallet, containing all my cards, in Ikea in Coventry. I?rang the store to see if the cards had been handed in. Thankfully they had, and I was told that I could come and collect them. I gave a date when I would next be in Coventry and Ikea told me where to collect it. But when I arrived at the appointed time, Ikea told me all my cards had been destroyed as I had not collected them within 24 hours. This was apparently “company policy”.

Ikea’s destruction of my property has cost me a fortune. Can you get it to make amends for the loss? CD, Oxford

Ikea’s destruction policy would be understandable if, after a week or so in its office safe, the wallet was unclaimed. But here, you made it clear when you could return to Coventry. Ikea’s local manager started to talk to Capital Letters­ but went silent when he realised I was not your partner. Its press ­office has since failed to communicate.

Besides the inconvenience of replacing bank and loyalty cards, you also lost a valuable train ticket and your driving licence. And when you returned, Ikea refused to refund two duvets you had bought because you no longer had the card.

Its £50 voucher offer is no help. Perhaps publication of this complaint will help Ikea’s head office remember that its obligations to customers should come ahead of whatever its internal rule book might say.

We welcome letters but regret we cannot answer individually. Email: capital.letters@guardian.co.uk Please include a daytime phone number

  • Credit cards
  • Consumer affairs
  • Ikea
guardian.co.uk ? Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Insurance: Cover up those excesses

Friday, June 5th, 2009

Now you can ‘insure’ all the initial charges payable when claiming on a policy. But do the sums add up?

UK householders can insure all their policy excesses with one low-cost annual payment. Insure4excess, which made its name offering car hire users cheap excess insurance, will now cover all the excesses payable on the five main policies: home, car, health, travel and pet insurance. It is also offering standalone car excess cover for the UK, and claims that it can pay for itself immediately.

What is it?

The basic cover – bronze – costs £49 a year. Householders can get back the excesses on any claims during the year up to £250. So, if your dog required surgery and you had to pay the first £50 of the pet insurance, it would refund that. If you were burgled and forked out a £100 excess it would return that too.

Can you insure more?

The silver policy costs £75, covering all excesses paid on claims made in one year up to £500. Gold costs £99 and covers up to £750. Payouts are triggered when a claim is made to the principle insurer. Policyholders have to be 25 or older.

How do the savings work?

The company says the policies will pay for themselves in reduced premiums, achieved by increasing the excesses on their main policies. Insure4excess says travel cover typically carries a £50 excess, while home and motor policies feature excesses (the first portion of a claim, paid by the customer) of up to £250. Generally, the higher the excess, the lower the premium.

These policies make particular sense if you have made a claim and are facing increased premiums as a result.

Insure4excess.com managing director Simon Vella, says: “People purchasing standard motor, home and pet policies will collectively save between £48 and £120 by tweaking their excess liabilities – and this is just for basic policies, before other cover amendments are made to further cut premiums. Our annual policy is much cheaper than the savings that can be made, so consumers will be quids in even if they don’t have to claim back excesses.”

Any downsides?

The problem of high excesses is that you effectively end up paying any small claims yourself, as Insure4excess only pays out once you make a claim to your main insurer. If you raised the car policy excess to £750, and bought its gold policy, you would only be able to make a claim costing more than £750. This can work for car drivers who would always pay any small claims themselves because the cost of claiming would be more than outweighed by the following year’s rise in premium.

Can I insure only my car excess?

Yes, and it will appeal to newly qualified car drivers who are aged over 25.

The company’s gold annual excess cover is £79 – many new drivers will save more than this by increasing the excess on their car insurance to £750.

Insure4excess would meet the first £750 of a claim with the insurer picking up the rest. Again, to buy the policy, you have to be 25 or over, making it a no-brainer for newly qualified drivers facing a huge first car insurance premium. Insure4excess allows two claims a year up to £750 each.

It also offers bronze cover for £39 which solely covers motor excesses of up to £250 while the silver policy costs £59 and covers excess of up to £500 – both will offer some older drivers savings, particularly if they have made , but it looks as though 25-year-olds will save the most.

Can it work for me?

Go to the insurance comparison websites (the likes of Confused.com or Moneysupermarket.com) or ask your existing insurers how much you will save if you increase the excesses. Car insurers will typically cut premiums by £20-£40 a year if you lift the excess from £100 to £300 – more for younger drivers. Home insurers will do the same. Make a £10-£20 saving on each of the five main policies and you’ll be in the money – and better insured.

  • Insurance
  • Home insurance
  • Motor insurance
  • Consumer affairs
guardian.co.uk ? Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

‘Your CV is exceptional … exceptionally bad, that is’

Thursday, June 4th, 2009

Last night’s Apprentice interviews were cringeworthy for many reasons, not least the interviewers’ performances. Have you ever endured a grilling from hell, asks Huma Qureshi

Oh dear, where on earth do we start when it comes to last night’s interview-round Apprentice? The penultimate episode of the series showed the candidates facing a grilling from Surallun’s cronies: Claude Littner (the bald cruel one), Bordan Tkachuk (the one with the spiky beard), Karren “nobody-calls-me-a-bitch” Brady, and Alan Watts (some lawyer we know nothing about).

It had it all: lies, profanities, bitchiness, tears and, well, just plain silliness (poor James. Still, he sort of had it coming, what with his Willy Wonka comment and all that).

Yet, despite their blips and blunders, you still had to feel sorry for this year’s lot. Lets face it, who would want to be interviewed by someone like cruel Claude? And who wouldn’t be rattled by an interviewer waving your finances in front of your face telling you your accounts are wrong?

Granted, an interview is not meant to be easy and you’re not there to make friends, but Claude is still one tough man to impress. “Your CV is exceptional,” he told James, who was so visibly relieved he actually closed his mouth. “Exceptionally bad, that is.” (James’s jaw promptly dropped again). Talk about leading you up the garden path.

Ditto with Karren. There she is one minute amiably chatting away with each of the girls, luring them in with her smiles, and then bang! The killer question disguised as a nicety. She caught out Lorraine’s CV lie and even managed to fluster head girl-material Kate.

But never mind the candidates, how did The Apprentice interviewers do in assessing the candidates? Not very well according to our in-house HR team:

“Interviews should be conducted to give people the best chance to showcase their skills and experience. Starting an interview [Lorraine's] by saying ‘you are clearly delusional’ is not only an assumption but it is offensive – the interviewer started the candidate off completely on the wrong foot.

“The best interviewers do not make assumptions, they collect evidence. And last night’s interviews were riddled with people making assumptions based on very little information.?

“As for ‘catching out candidates’, yes an interviewer has a responsibility to check the facts but there is no excuse to do this by interrogation and rudeness.?Any company who wants to attract talent should ensure their interviewers are professional, precise and also represent the company (would anyone want to work for a company who values Claude’s interpersonal skills?).”

What do you think? Have you ever thought an interview was going well only for the interviewer to turn around and tell you otherwise? Or have you been let down by an interviewer who didn’t give you a chance to explain yourself?

  • Work & careers
  • The Apprentice
  • Reality TV
  • Television
guardian.co.uk ? Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

House prices rise by 2.6%

Thursday, June 4th, 2009

• House prices rise for first time since January
• Halifax says there are ‘tentative indications’ of stabilisation

House prices rose by 2.6% in May after three months of successive falls, according to figures published today by the UK’s largest lender.

Halifax’s latest snapshot of the housing market showed the annual rate of price deflation fell from a high of 17.7% in April to 16.3%. On its index the average price of a property stands at £158,565, around £4,000 more than in April but £25,000 less than last May.

The monthly rise, which follows three months of falls of between 1.8% and 2.3%, is even bigger than the 1.2% reported last week by Nationwide building society.

Halifax said there were “some tentative indications” that activity in the housing market was stabilising, but stressed it was important not to place too much weight on one month’s figures.

Nitesh Patel, the bank’s housing economist, said: “Historically, house prices have not moved in the same direction month after month even during a pronounced downturn.?

“For example, prices fell by 11% nationally during 1991 and 1992, but there were five monthly price rises in this period.”

The three-month figures, which are a better indicator of the underlying trend, continued to show a fall with prices dropping by 3.1% in the quarter to May. However, the rate on this measure has slowed since January when it was above 5%.

Patel said months of house price falls and low interest rates had made homes more affordable and boosted the number of first-time buyers entering the market.

Halifax’s house prices-to-earning ratio has declined from a peak of 5.84 to 4.36 in May, a level last seen in January 2003, while the proportion of disposable income a buyer needs to meet typical mortgage repayments had fallen to 31% by the end of last year – below the average of 37% recorded over the past 25 years.

Figures for March from the Council of Mortgage Lenders showed first-time buyers accounted for 40% of borrowers taking a mortgage for a house purchase – the highest percentage since April 2005 – while more recent figures from the Bank of England showed buyer numbers rose in April.

Buyers still struggling

However, although some lenders have increased the amount they are willing to lend in recent weeks, many buyers are still struggling to get loans and the numbers entering the housing market remain historically low, with the Bank’s figures showing mortgage approval figures down by 22% year-on-year.

Patel said: “House sales remain substantially below their long-term average and market conditions are expected to remain difficult with housing activity continuing at low levels over the coming months.”

Until demand for property increases, house prices are likely to remain volatile.

Howard Archer, chief UK economist at IHS Global Insight, said the figures were “an eye opener”, but he was sceptical that house prices have bottomed out.

“Significantly, it is not uncommon for there to be months of rising prices when house prices are still trending down,” he said. “Despite the robust Halifax and Nationwide data for May, we are sticking for now to our forecast that house prices will fall by another 10% from current levels to trough around mid-2010.

“However, we accept that this could turn out to be too pessimistic, particularly if the economy does start to grow in the near term and unemployment rises less than we fear.”

David Smith, senior partner at property firm Carter Jonas, said Halifax’s figures were “encouraging, but let’s not get carried away”.

“The economy is still far too fragile to talk of a sustained recovery in the housing market, but the hope is that we are past the worst,” he added.

  • House prices
  • Property
  • Housing market
guardian.co.uk ? Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Ryanair defends pay-per-pee fee

Tuesday, June 2nd, 2009

• Budget airline boss confirms plan to charge for using toilets
• Loos will be removed to make way for more seats

Ryanair boss, Michael O’Leary, insisted today that it will cost passengers a pound to spend a penny as he confirmed plans to charge for toilets on his aeroplanes within two years.

The chief executive of Europe’s largest budget carrier said the airline would also generate extra revenues by removing two out of the three toilets on its Boeing 737-800 jets and filling the space with up to six seats.

O’Leary first mooted the toilet charges in February, prompting his press officer to warn that the outspoken executive “makes a lot of this stuff up as he goes along”. However, O’Leary confirmed that he will ask Boeing to look at putting credit card readers on toilet locks for new aircraft.

“We are serious about it,” said O’Leary, who has acquired the nickname Michael O’Really within aviation circles for some of his more outlandish claims. He added: “We are flying aircraft on an average flight time of one hour around Europe. What the hell do we need three toilets for?” He denied that Ryanair was considering the ploy to make a profit from toilet breaks. “It’s not because we need to generate money from the jacks. But … if you get rid of two [toilets] you can get six seats on a 737. They will all be scurrying to the toilet before the departure gate.”

Asked if he would be interested in charging £5 a toilet visit in order to eliminate the need for the loo altogether, he said: “If someone wanted to pay £5 to go to the toilet I would carry them myself. I would wipe their bums for a fiver.”

O’Leary added that Boeing’s research department would now be able to work on the toilet concept because “war in Iraq and Afghanistan is winding down”.

Ryanair is one of the pioneers of the add-on fees that are a distinctive feature of the low-cost business model and makes huge profits from imposing service charges that would have been unthinkable 20 years ago, such as bag check-in fees.

A poorly judged investment in Irish rival Aer Lingus pushed Ryanair into its first annual loss in 20 years today, but the airline is profitable once those losses are stripped out, helped by a 23% increase in revenues from add-on charges to €598m (£518m). Those so-called ancillary revenues now play an increasingly important role in underpinning Ryanair’s profits and a loo fee will only increase their profitability.

  • Ryanair
  • Airline industry
  • Ireland
  • Consumer affairs
guardian.co.uk ? Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Write a will: it’s the first thing to do before you die

Tuesday, June 2nd, 2009

A third of us die without a will. Apart from being a problem for your family, the only winner will be the state

Dying intestate – without writing a will – risks leaving your estate in the wrong hands and a larger slice with the taxman than necessary.

The Law Society says one in three people in the UK die intestate, and half of all people over the age of 45 have not made a will. Caroline Wallis, wealth protection partner at solicitors Boyes Turner, says: “It’s far better to make a will at any stage of life than let the intestacy rules come into play which can prove pretty disastrous in many types of situations. This remains a vital part of financial planning to reduce the risk of leaving unintended bequests to the state or distant family members.”

The good news for people who fail to make a will is that the rules governing an intestate death changed to their benefit in February, allowing more of their estate to be given to their spouse or civil partner.

Previously, if you did not have children £200,000 of your estate was awarded to your spouse should you die without a will. This figure has now been increased to £450,000. The remainder of an estate is then halved between your parents and your spouse. Should your parents be dead it is divided between your siblings and your spouse.

If you do have children, £250,000 (previously £125,000) of your estate will be awarded to your spouse before the remainder is divided between your children. Should the assets be worth more than £250,000 the rest is shared according to a stringent formula.

“These are positive changes as they recognise that estate values are far higher now,” Wallis says. “They give extra protection for the surviving spouse, but making a will is still vitally important for many people.”

Even with the increases in the limits a spouse or civil partner receives, they could still lose a substantial slice of the assets and income built up by their joint efforts.

People living with their partner outside marriage or civil partnership are most at risk. If there are no close relatives then the entire estate goes to the crown under intestacy rules, regardless of any unmarried partner who may have lived with the deceased – risking leaving your partner homeless unless you own the property jointly.

This could mean extensive legal costs for your beneficiaries, as they may have to hire legal help to contest the state’s decisions.

Despite recent changes to taxation, wills are still a useful way to safeguard the interests of your family. “They are really about estate planning these days rather than tax planning,” Linda Packard, director of probate specialist Kings Court Trust Corporation, says. “While they are used to avoid tax, people have more complicated lives these days and it’s about trying to be fair to everyone in your family.”

Dying intestate rules out gifts to charities or bequests to friends, or the ability to give one child more than another – or deal with more complex, but common, family arrangements such as stepchildren. You may also want to outline personal wishes, such as funeral arrangements or who should inherit particular property or items of worth.

Wallis says: “If you’re making a will later in life the first thing to think about is your spouse’s state of health and how they will cope if they have to go into a nursing home and whether the value of the estate means looking at some IHT [inheritance tax] planning.”

Trusts can also be written into a will to avoid nursing home or residential home fees that might be payable by a surviving spouse. “You would use a property trust, transferring your share of the property into this, and in the terms you would give a life interest to your surviving spouse making it more difficult for the state to claim it for nursing home fees,” Packard says. “And you can use a nil-rate band trust to make provision for your children or stepchildren.”

Writing a will with a solicitor costs between £150 and £200. You can buy do-it-yourself kits from stationers such as WH Smith or the Post Office for between £5 and £20, but these can be difficult to complete accurately, particularly if your financial affairs are complicated. Completing the forms wrongly could mean your will is invalid, leaving your estate ruled by the laws of intestacy or open to challenge.


Living Wills

An advance decision, sometimes called a living will, is a set of legally binding instructions that a person draws up to set out what they would like to happen if they lose the capacity to make or communicate healthcare decisions, for example if they are injured in a car crash or suffer an illness such as dementia.

Jo Cartwright, a spokeswoman for Dignity in Dying, says: “They may wish to refuse life sustaining treatment in this case, and want life support to be removed. So they would put in place an advance decision – which can just be a written statement – to make their decision known. This can be lodged with a doctor and a copy kept with a family member.”

She adds that this could be used as a standalone document or to compliment the lasting powers of attorney (LPA), which you can set up to cover your health and welfare as well as financial affairs. An LPA is a legal document giving decision making powers on healthcare, property and finance, to a friend or family member. Like an advance decision, this can also be put in place in advance of a loss of capacity and enacted at a later date.

Go to the government’s site for more information; you can get an advance decision pack from dignityindying.org.uk costing £25, or by calling 020 7479 7737.


The law in Scotland

For people with Scottish roots or other connections, the situation regarding wills is more complicated, writes Neasa MacErlean. While Scots can leave their land and buildings to whoever they like, there are provisions ensuring that spouses and children get a share in their “moveable” property – cash, shares and other assets. These inheritance rules apply in Scotland to people who die without a will and also overrule a will that tries to exclude spouses or offspring.

If there is no will, a Scottish widow or widower would get the first £300,000 of a house as well as the first £24,000 of assets such as furniture, and then £42,000 of cash if there were children or £75,000 if there weren’t.

Then there are so-called “legal rights” which apply whether there is a will or not. The widow or widower would also be entitled to claim “legal rights” to half of any other moveable assets, or a third of those assets if there were children.

The estate of a Scot who died in London, say, would be governed by Scottish law if it was clear that he intended to live in Scotland again. If, however, he had made England his permanent home, all his estate – including any assets in Scotland – would then be governed by English law.

Life after death: Where your money goes if you die without a will

I am single Your estate will be shared equally among any children you have. If you don’t have children it will be divided between your parents, and if your parents are dead between your siblings.

If you have no immediate family, half-brothers or half-sisters followed by grandparents and then any aunts or uncles will inherit. If you have none of these, everything will go to the crown.

I live with my partner, but we are not married Things might have moved on when it comes to equality for unmarried couples, but not as far as dying without a will is concerned. The Treasury will treat you as though you are single so your estate will be distributed in the same way as above. This is why it is particularly important to draw up a will if you want your partner to inherit.

I am married If your estate – including your home – is worth less than £125,000 (£250,000 from 1 February), your spouse will inherit everything. If it is worth more and you have any children, from this marriage or a previous one, your spouse will get the first £125,000 (£250,000 from 1 February) and life interest in half the remainder. The children share the rest. If there are no children your spouse will get the first £200,000 (rising to £400,000 on 1 February) and half the remainder. Your parents will share the rest. If your parents have died, any brothers, sisters, nephews and nieces will share the rest. If there are none your spouse inherits everything.

Source: www.makingawill.org.uk

  • Writing a will
  • Inheritance tax
  • Tax
guardian.co.uk ? Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Watchdog sniffs at Southeastern’s high-speed fares

Monday, June 1st, 2009

Passenger Focus criticises the cost of travel on the new Kent commuter service, where tickets will cost up to a third more

The rail passenger watchdog has criticised Britain’s first high-speed commuter service after it emerged that fares will cost up to a third more than on conventional routes.

Southeastern will charge £24.30 for a return fare from Ebbsfleet International in Kent to St Pancras in central London – an increase of 34% on the current service. A weekly travelcard from Ashford International to St Pancras will be 20% more expensive than the current service at £113.40 a week.

Charles Horton, Southeastern’s managing director, said the fares applied to preview services only. “We feel they offer value for money for passengers who will now be able to get to London in 37 minutes from Ashford and just 17 minutes from Ebbsfleet,” he said.

Passenger Focus, the rail user watchdog, welcomed the service, which will run preview services for the public from 29 June, but expressed concerns over the fare increases.

“We would hope Southeastern would consider offering incentives and discounts to make the service more affordable,” said Tunde Olatunji, Passenger Focus manager for Kent. “Ultimately, passengers now have a choice of a much faster service but at a higher price. Passengers will use Southeastern’s high-speed service if they believe it offers value for money.”

Passenger Focus has urged the government to consider pumping more subsidy into the railways after warning that fares on some routes are the most expensive in Europe. Commuters will receive some respite next year, when deflation will push down the cost of season tickets on most franchises. But Southeastern will be better protected from fare cuts because it is allowed to impose higher price increases than other operators.

However, the company has expressed fears that the high-speed route, which is a key part of its business plan, will raise less revenue than expected due to the recession.

  • Consumer affairs
  • Transport policy
  • Rail travel
guardian.co.uk ? Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds