Posts Tagged ‘business’

Mortgage protection could become mis-selling scandal

Tuesday, June 9th, 2009

Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2009/jun/09/mortgage-insurance-warning

Don’t cut protection in face of rising unemployment, regulator tells insurers

City watchdog Lord Turner attacked insurers today for threatening to water down unemployment protection on mortgages, warning he would investigate any attempt to push through price rises due to the recession.

The chairman of the Financial Services Authority warned the industry it risked repeating the mistakes of past scandals such as the mis-selling of endowment mortgages.

Concern has grown that insurers plan to increase prices for customers with mortgage payment protection insurance and restrict the scope of policies to reduce payout costs, ahead of an expected surge in unemployment in the second half of the year.

He told an audience of insurance executives at a conference organised by the Association of British Insurers that the industry would provoke an angry response from customers, which the regulator would need to take seriously.

“Whilst it is natural for the industry to respond to changes in risk, this raises issues with both unfair contract terms, disclosure and our ‘treating customers fairly’ principles,” he said.

“How many consumers would have taken up this cover if they had known that at the very time they needed the protection the most, the price of it could significantly increase or the amount of cover decrease?

“This is an area where insurers must expect us to intervene to address poor consumer outcomes. And more than that they must think strategically about the impact of their actions on the sector’s reputation.”

The warning is understood to follow moves by the Post Office to raise prices on its mortgage protection policies that cover payments during periods of unemployment or after accidents and during long-term sickness. In April the Post Office gave 30 days notice that it also planned to reduce the level of cover from a maximum £2,500 a month to £1,500. Claimants will also have to wait for 90 days after stopping work before they receive any money. The delay was previously 30 days.

Turner said he was aware the number of people with the insurance had fallen in recent years. In 2005 there were 2.5m policies covering just over a fifth of the 11.6m mortgages in the UK. By 2007 MPPI policies had fallen to 1.2m and 700,000 in 2008.

He said: “While mortgage payment protection insurance has not previously been a major focus of our concerns, it may become one in an economic downturn. As the likelihood of unemployment-related claims increases, some insurers are responding by increasing premiums or reducing cover for existing policyholders.”

The FSA and the Competition Commission have spent the last four years investigating accusations of profiteering by lenders that sell payment protection insurance on loans and credit cards. Last year the commission ruled that selling practices were so bad that it banned the sale of the most profitable product until at least a fortnight after the purchase of a credit card or loan. The industry appealed, but was unsuccessful.

Turner said he would not hesitate to repeat the enforcement measures on insurers that contravened rules on the sale of mortgage payment protection.

He said: “The recent problems may have been primarily in the banking industry and that is where the most significant changes are needed, but in an era of heightened public expectations that the FSA will identify and prevent major problems from recurring, we need to reinforce our capability across all high impact firms.

“And we need to respond to people’s expectations that we will be more forceful in pursuing enforcement against reckless or abusive practices which cause customers harm.

“We certainly need to ensure that our responses are proportionate and are focused on what matters: that they are outcome focused. And we will also continue to look for market solutions where they are available, such as in addressing contract certainty and commission disclosure.”

  • Regulators
  • Insurance industry
  • Mortgages
  • Insurance
  • Payment protection insurance
guardian.co.uk ? Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

House prices buoyed by property shortage

Tuesday, June 9th, 2009

Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2009/jun/09/rics-house-prices

A combination of rising buyer inquiries and a shortage of homes for sale is supporting house prices, Rics says

Increasing interest from new buyers plus a shortage of properties for sale is helping to stabilise house prices, according to the latest housing market survey from the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (Rics).

Rics’s members said buyer inquiries increased for the seventh month in a row in May, and at the fastest rate since 1999. Estate agents also saw a rise in sales, albeit from very depressed levels. The average number of properties sold over the past three months rose to 11.8, up from 10.6. Fewer surveyors also reported a fall in house prices.

At the same time new instructions have continued to fall: the average number of properties on estate agents’ books has dropped in the past month to 58.4 from 69.4, and by more than a third over the past year.

Rics said the lack of new supply coupled with the increase in activity is providing some support for house prices, but warned there could be further price falls to come. Spokesman Ian Perry said: “The housing market does appear to be close to bottoming out with activity picking up in a material way and prices at last stabilising.

“However, it is important to remember that the lack of supply has been as important in underpinning prices as the rise in demand. Moreover, with the economic backdrop still quite uncertain, unemployment set to continue increasing sharply and finance for first-time buyers still in short supply, there are a number of significant obstacles for the market to overcome over the coming months.”

The findings from Rics were supported by house price figures published today by the government’s communities department , which showed prices rose by 1.1% month-on-month in April, after dropping 1.3% in March. This means the year-on-year fall in house prices narrowed to 13% in April from 13.6% in March.

In London, the improving market is being driven by first-time buyers who have built up equity over the past two years, or who have been lent deposits by their parents, taking advantage of lower prices, according to estate agent Ludlow Thompson.

Director, Stephen Ludlow, said: “Sentiment has changed considerably – at the end of last year nobody could see a floor for prices. Whilst prices may not have reached the very bottom buyers are no longer worried that the market is still in meltdown mode.

“The pickup in demand in May was so sudden that it has been the lack of supply of properties actually on the market that caused the bounce in prices. We’ve had to move lettings staff on to sales to deal with the surge in activity.”

However, Howard Archer, chief UK and European economist for IHS Global Insight, said he remained sceptical that house prices had bottomed out.

“It is not uncommon for there to be months of rising prices when house prices are still trending down. Most recently, the Halifax reported that house prices rose by 2% month-on-month in January but then fell sharply during February-April before rising again in May.

“Housing market activity is still very low by past norms and at a level consistent with falling house prices, and despite markedly rising buyer interest we believe that the pickup in actual house purchases is likely to be gradual and fitful for some time to come.”

  • House prices
  • Property
  • First-time buyers
  • Housing market
guardian.co.uk ? Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

House prices buoyed by property shortage

Tuesday, June 9th, 2009

Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2009/jun/09/rics-house-prices

A combination of rising buyer inquiries and a shortage of homes for sale is supporting house prices, Rics says

Increasing interest from new buyers plus a shortage of properties for sale is helping to stabilise house prices, according to the latest housing market survey from the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (Rics).

Rics’s members said buyer inquiries increased for the seventh month in a row in May, and at the fastest rate since 1999. Estate agents also saw a rise in sales, albeit from very depressed levels. The average number of properties sold over the past three months rose to 11.8, up from 10.6. Fewer surveyors also reported a fall in house prices.

At the same time new instructions have continued to fall: the average number of properties on estate agents’ books has dropped in the past month to 58.4 from 69.4, and by more than a third over the past year.

Rics said the lack of new supply coupled with the increase in activity is providing some support for house prices, but warned there could be further price falls to come. Spokesman Ian Perry said: “The housing market does appear to be close to bottoming out with activity picking up in a material way and prices at last stabilising.

“However, it is important to remember that the lack of supply has been as important in underpinning prices as the rise in demand. Moreover, with the economic backdrop still quite uncertain, unemployment set to continue increasing sharply and finance for first-time buyers still in short supply, there are a number of significant obstacles for the market to overcome over the coming months.”

The findings from Rics were supported by house price figures published today by the government’s communities department , which showed prices rose by 1.1% month-on-month in April, after dropping 1.3% in March. This means the year-on-year fall in house prices narrowed to 13% in April from 13.6% in March.

In London, the improving market is being driven by first-time buyers who have built up equity over the past two years, or who have been lent deposits by their parents, taking advantage of lower prices, according to estate agent Ludlow Thompson.

Director, Stephen Ludlow, said: “Sentiment has changed considerably – at the end of last year nobody could see a floor for prices. Whilst prices may not have reached the very bottom buyers are no longer worried that the market is still in meltdown mode.

“The pickup in demand in May was so sudden that it has been the lack of supply of properties actually on the market that caused the bounce in prices. We’ve had to move lettings staff on to sales to deal with the surge in activity.”

However, Howard Archer, chief UK and European economist for IHS Global Insight, said he remained sceptical that house prices had bottomed out.

“It is not uncommon for there to be months of rising prices when house prices are still trending down. Most recently, the Halifax reported that house prices rose by 2% month-on-month in January but then fell sharply during February-April before rising again in May.

“Housing market activity is still very low by past norms and at a level consistent with falling house prices, and despite markedly rising buyer interest we believe that the pickup in actual house purchases is likely to be gradual and fitful for some time to come.”

  • House prices
  • Property
  • First-time buyers
  • Housing market
guardian.co.uk ? Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Employers ‘targeting pregnant women for redundancy’

Friday, June 5th, 2009

Campaign groups report sharp rise in number of women losing their jobs during maternity leave or pregnancy

The number of pregnant women and new mothers losing their jobs has shown an “alarming” rise as employers target them for redundancy ahead of childless colleagues, according to an alliance of support groups launched this week.

The Alliance Against Pregnancy Discrimination in the Workplace has identified a sharp increase in women consulting lawyers or calling helplines because their jobs have been terminated during maternity leave or pregnancy.

“It appears that some employers are using the recession as an excuse to break the law on discrimination,” the alliance warnedyesterday. Campaigners said that the “long-term consequences of job loss as a result of pregnancy or maternity leave jeopardise women’s financial security for their whole lives”.

About 30,000 women are estimated to lose their jobs as a result of pregnancy every year, according to the Equality and Human Rights Commission, but that figure is expected to rise because of the economic downturn. The government is not collecting data on this kind of discrimination, and it is too early for the tribunals service to have tracked a spike, but campaigners say a wealth of anecdotal evidence suggests there has been a steep increase. Camilla Palmer, a lawyer specialising in pregnancy and maternity-related discrimination with Leigh Day & Co, said that more people were losing their jobs across the board, but that pregnant women and new mothers appeared to be disproportionately affected.

Cases where women on pregnancy-related leave lost their jobs because whole departments closed were discounted, she said, but the firm was dealing with more calls from new mothers singled out for redundancy.

The increase in calls from women concerned about pregnancy-related unfair dismissal was so steep that the company launched a dedicated helpline last month to offer preliminary advice on employment rights in this area.

Elizabeth Gardiner, parliamentary policy officer at Working Families, a campaign group on work-life balance that is part of the alliance, said women had approached them with more severe examples of discrimination in recent months. “Employers seem much more willing to flout the law,” she said.

Campaigners are concerned that attitudes towards maternity rights have hardened among many employers whose businesses are struggling in the economic downturn. The alliance believes that new mothers will be seen as “fair game” for dismissal during the recession, and cites remarks by Sir Alan Sugar as evidence of a new hostility in the business community to enhanced maternity rights. Sugar said: “We have maternity laws where people are entitled to have too much. Everything has gone too far.”

  • Children
  • Family
  • Maternity & paternity rights
  • Redundancy
  • Work & careers
  • Equality
  • Discrimination at work
guardian.co.uk ? Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Cash Isa rates tumble

Thursday, June 4th, 2009

• Barclays cuts rates to 0.1% on some cash Isas
• Savers warned best rates may not last long

Savers are being warned to check the interest paid on their individual savings accounts following a move by Barclays to slash the rates as low as 0.1% on some of its older accounts.

Loyal customers who have more than £18,000 accumulated in the bank’s variable-rate mini cash Isa have had their interest chopped from 0.31% to 0.1%. Those with less than £18,000 in the account were already earning 0.1%.

Barclays will continue to pay 3.61% AER to existing customers with its Golden Isa, a rate that includes a 1% bonus, but has disposed of the bonus for new savers.

A spokeswoman for Barclays said people stuck in the ultra-low earning Isa could not switch to the Golden Isa, as it did not accept transfers. However she denied Barclays was treating its loyal customers shabbily.

She said: “We are making some minor alterations to the interest rates in our current range, the vast majority of our savers will not be impacted.

“Our savings products have and continue to be very successful with MoreForMore and Monthly Savings being leading rates. We continue to review the rates on our range of saving accounts in tandem with market conditions to ensure they are fairly and competitively priced.”

She added that savers who wanted to switch out of an old Isa should speak to the bank about their options.

Barclays is not alone in cutting savings rates. Although the Bank of England monetary policy committee today held the base rate at 0.5%, several banks and building societies are reducing the amount they pay on deposits.

Andrew Hagger of Moneynet.co.uk said: “We’re only two months into the new tax year, yet some of the more attractive cash Isa accounts have, in the last seven days, either had their rates slashed or been withdrawn completely.”

In addition to swingeing cuts to Barclays Isas, Halifax has pulled its Direct Reward Isa, which paid 3% fixed for 12 months, while First Direct has chopped the interest on its e-ISA account from 3.06% to a fixed rate of 1.98%.

Last month, NatWest cut the rate it paid on its attractive e-Isa by 1% and withdrew its Cash Isa Plus – both were at or near the best rates on offer, paying more than 3.5% in most cases. NatWest’s e-Isa now pays 2.25% on balances up to £9,999 and 2.5% on savings above £10,000. .

Hagger said: “It’s starting to look as if some providers may have reached their targets for Isa deposits already and are content to offer a poorer deal to those who have been slow off the mark.

“So if you haven’t invested your Isa cash for 2009-10, even though there are still 10 months still to run in this tax year, it may be prudent to make your choice sooner rather than later, before some of the other top deals disappear too.”

  • Isas
  • Savings
  • Interest rates
  • Interest rates
guardian.co.uk ? Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Sale and rent back regulation begins

Wednesday, June 3rd, 2009

• Interim measures will offer protection against rogue firms
• Full regulation to be introduced in June 2010

Homeowners who fall victim to rogue sale and rent back companies may be able to claim compensation from 1 July in the first step towards full regulation of the schemes by the Financial Services Authority (FSA).

Full regulation will be introduced on 30 June next year, but it was announced today that the watchdog would introduce interim steps to tackle immediate consumer problems.

From the start of next month, people who lose money or their homes through these controversial schemes will be able to take their cases to the Financial Ombudsman Service if complaints to the companies themselves are not handled in a satisfactory way.

Sale and rent back companies, which usually advertise in the back of tabloid newspapers and online, target struggling homeowners by offering to buy their homes and allowing them to continue living in them as tenants, usually on an assured shorthold tenancy lasting six to 12 months.

Homeowners often stump up the cost of a valuation – typically about £500 – only to find the price being offered falls far short of the market value.

Up until now the companies have been unregulated and some homeowners who have gone ahead with the deals have found themselves facing eviction because the new owner wants to sell the property on or has failed to keep up with mortgage payments.

Under the interim regime, firms will have to apply for permission from the FSA to continue trading: they must comply with the FSA’s principles for businesses and will be required to have adequate resources and be run by fit and proper people. The watchdog will be able to stop, ban or fine firms that break the rules.

The move follows Office of Fair Trading (OFT) research last year which identified a number of risks to homeowners entering into these arrangements. The OFT made three recommendations to the government including compulsory regulation, increased consumer awareness and improved information about housing benefits.

A recent FSA survey found that only 42% of people questioned knew that sale and rent back is unregulated, although 58% thought that it should be. The majority also thought they would be entitled to stay in their home for more than five years, while the typical contract is six to 12 months.

Ed Harley, the FSA’s head of mortgage policy, said: “We know that some consumers enter into sale and rent back arrangements without understanding the costs and risks involved. This can be a source of real distress for people in already difficult circumstances.?

“Firms entering our regime will need to run their business in a way that means customers are treated fairly. This includes making clear to customers important details, such as the length of time they can stay in the property, before they enter into the arrangement.”

Homeowner victims

The Observer has been highlighting the plight of those who have already fallen victim to sale and rent back schemes for several years. Unfortunately, the rule changes will not allow those who have suffered from rogue firms to claim compensation retrospectively.

Jean Turner and her husband sold their Norwich home to a sale and rent back company after falling three months into arrears on their mortgage. Although they only owed £1,500 they had been taken to court by their lender and faced repossession.

Jean, now aged 53 and on disability benefits, approached the local council for advice and was given the number of a sale and rent back firm called Home Assured. Its representative visited the Turners and agreed to buy their home; the firm paid off the outstanding mortgage and arrears. The Turners then paid £500 a month in rent to stay in their home, the same amount they had been paying for their mortgage, but had no tenancy agreement or rent book.

Jean, who has since split up from her partner, discovered that although she was still paying rent to Home Assured it had subsequently sold her home to another owner. She received a court summons because the new owner failed to keep up with the mortgage payments, and the final straw came when he tried to raise the rent from £500 to £650, saying that all she had to do was ask the council for more money.

Jean refused and instead went to Shelter for help and now lives in local authority housing. “It was a horrible experience,” she said. “It is about time someone did something about these schemes. I wouldn’t want anyone to go through what I have over the past few years.”

The danger of people falling prey to unscrupulous firms should also be reduced by the introduction of the government’s £285m mortgage rescue scheme in January. Although only two households had been officially rescued by the end of April, government officials said more will be helped with 70 cases in the pipeline.

  • Property
  • Renting property
  • Borrowing & debt
  • Mortgages
  • Social exclusion
guardian.co.uk ? Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Mortgage approvals rise again

Tuesday, June 2nd, 2009

• Number of mortgages approved in April increased to 43,201
• Economists caution that lending remains historically low

The number and value of mortgage approvals for house purchases increased slightly in April, according to figures out today from the Bank of England.

The value of approvals for home purchase mortgages increased by £5bn in April compared with a rise of £4.7bn in March, and was up on the previous six-month average of £4bn.

The number of loans approved increased to 43,201, up from 40,038 in March and a substantial increase compared with the six-month average of 33,845. However, mortgage approvals for homebuyers were still 22% lower than last April.

The value of approvals for all types of home loans, including remortgages as well as purchases, increased by £9.8bn in April compared with a rise of £9.5bn in March, but below the previous six-month average of £10.3bn.

The value of remortgages remained static at £3.9bn in both March and April, while the number of remortgages edged downwards to 31,800 from 32,045 in March, against a six-month average of 41,054.

The pick up in approvals is a further sign that the housing market may be starting to stabilise after many months of falling activity.

Last week, Nationwide reported a 1.2% jump in UK house prices in May, the second increase in three months, while property intelligence group Hometrack said they remained unchanged during the month.

However, many economists remain cautious about any signs of a potential recovery.

Paul Samter, economist at the Council of Mortgage Lenders, said it was “almost inevitable” that approvals in May would be higher than a year ago, but added: “Activity remains at extremely low levels on any historic comparison, and weaker than at any point in the early 1990s.

“Limited lending capacity and the impact of further job losses are likely to act as a ceiling for how far the improvement can continue, although there could be further modest rises in the coming months.”

Simon Rubinsohn, chief economist at the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors, agreed: “The improving picture still needs to be kept in some context. Recent numbers have been far lower than would typically be expected even in the midst of a recession, and it is still unclear how rising unemployment levels will affect any recovery.”

Total net lending, which includes mortgages and unsecured borrowing through loans, credit cards and other consumer credit rose by £1.3bn in April, almost double the previous month’s increase of £0.7bn. However, the figure was down compared with the six-month average of £1.4bn.

Consumer credit, which includes credit card lending and personal loans, increased by £0.3bn, higher than the previous month’s increase of £0.1bn but down compared with the six-month average of £0.4bn.

  • Mortgages
  • Property
  • Borrowing & debt
  • Credit cards
  • Personal loans
  • Mortgage lending figures
guardian.co.uk ? Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Allotment demand leads to 40-year waiting lists

Tuesday, June 2nd, 2009

• For every UK allotment plot there are 30 applicants
• Allotment owners ’save £950 a year’ growing their own

Demand for allotments has reached such heights that in one London borough would-be gardeners will be waiting 40 years for a patch of land, it emerged today.

Latest research commissioned by home insurer LV= (formerly Liverpool Victoria) also revealed that for every UK allotment plot there are 30 people waiting to get their hands on one – providing evidence of our recession-fuelled enthusiasm for homegrown produce and the desire of many city dwellers to embrace “the good life” by getting back to the land.

Applicants are typically looking at an average wait of three years, although in some areas it will probably be decades before these green-fingered hopefuls are finally able to harvest the fruits (and vegetables) of their labour.

The research named the London boroughs of Camden and Islington as areas where plot availability is particularly problematic, with waiting times estimated at up to 40 and 25 years respectively, suggesting that a Camden resident who registers for a plot after finishing university might just get to access to it by the time they retire.

A spokeswoman for Camden council said: “We can confirm that Camden has a waiting list of about 40 years for a council allotment. This is because we have got 195 allotment plots in Camden but more than 800 people waiting.”

She added: “Allotment gardening is a growing passion for many people in the borough. We are encouraging people on the waiting list to contact neighbouring authorities such as Barnet and Brent who have a greater number of plots.”

The survey of more than 300 local authorities found demand for allotments had seen a “massive resurgence,” with almost 6 million people wanting to rent one but only 206,000 plots across the UK.

The picture was brighter in the Midlands, with North Shropshire, Nottingham City and Bassetlaw District in Nottinghamshire all reporting available spaces within an average of five months.

LV= described its survey as the first comprehensive allotment survey in more than a decade. It also found that allotment owners claimed they save an average of £950 a year through home growing. More than half of those quizzed chose to rent a plot to save money, while a third did so to be in control of the pesticides used on their food.

Teaching children about food was also a factor for some, with almost one in three (30%) “growing their own” as a way to show their kids where fruit and vegetables come from.

Meanwhile, it seems the profile of the typical allotment owner is changing, with single parents the group most likely to want to rent or apply for a plot.

Geoff Stokes, secretary of the National Society of Allotment and Leisure Gardeners, said: “We welcome this new insight into allotment accessibility in Britain, and it’s encouraging that so many people are interested in getting out and getting in to some green space.

“Allotment gardening is a fantastic hobby and has so many benefits – it is cheap, it is good for you, and it can save you hundreds of pounds a year on food.”

In February, the National Trust announced it was creating up to 1,000 plots to be used as allotments or community gardens to meet some of the demand from consumers.

  • Saving money
  • Consumer affairs
  • Family finances
  • Gardens
guardian.co.uk ? Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Write a will: it’s the first thing to do before you die

Tuesday, June 2nd, 2009

A third of us die without a will. Apart from being a problem for your family, the only winner will be the state

Dying intestate – without writing a will – risks leaving your estate in the wrong hands and a larger slice with the taxman than necessary.

The Law Society says one in three people in the UK die intestate, and half of all people over the age of 45 have not made a will. Caroline Wallis, wealth protection partner at solicitors Boyes Turner, says: “It’s far better to make a will at any stage of life than let the intestacy rules come into play which can prove pretty disastrous in many types of situations. This remains a vital part of financial planning to reduce the risk of leaving unintended bequests to the state or distant family members.”

The good news for people who fail to make a will is that the rules governing an intestate death changed to their benefit in February, allowing more of their estate to be given to their spouse or civil partner.

Previously, if you did not have children £200,000 of your estate was awarded to your spouse should you die without a will. This figure has now been increased to £450,000. The remainder of an estate is then halved between your parents and your spouse. Should your parents be dead it is divided between your siblings and your spouse.

If you do have children, £250,000 (previously £125,000) of your estate will be awarded to your spouse before the remainder is divided between your children. Should the assets be worth more than £250,000 the rest is shared according to a stringent formula.

“These are positive changes as they recognise that estate values are far higher now,” Wallis says. “They give extra protection for the surviving spouse, but making a will is still vitally important for many people.”

Even with the increases in the limits a spouse or civil partner receives, they could still lose a substantial slice of the assets and income built up by their joint efforts.

People living with their partner outside marriage or civil partnership are most at risk. If there are no close relatives then the entire estate goes to the crown under intestacy rules, regardless of any unmarried partner who may have lived with the deceased – risking leaving your partner homeless unless you own the property jointly.

This could mean extensive legal costs for your beneficiaries, as they may have to hire legal help to contest the state’s decisions.

Despite recent changes to taxation, wills are still a useful way to safeguard the interests of your family. “They are really about estate planning these days rather than tax planning,” Linda Packard, director of probate specialist Kings Court Trust Corporation, says. “While they are used to avoid tax, people have more complicated lives these days and it’s about trying to be fair to everyone in your family.”

Dying intestate rules out gifts to charities or bequests to friends, or the ability to give one child more than another – or deal with more complex, but common, family arrangements such as stepchildren. You may also want to outline personal wishes, such as funeral arrangements or who should inherit particular property or items of worth.

Wallis says: “If you’re making a will later in life the first thing to think about is your spouse’s state of health and how they will cope if they have to go into a nursing home and whether the value of the estate means looking at some IHT [inheritance tax] planning.”

Trusts can also be written into a will to avoid nursing home or residential home fees that might be payable by a surviving spouse. “You would use a property trust, transferring your share of the property into this, and in the terms you would give a life interest to your surviving spouse making it more difficult for the state to claim it for nursing home fees,” Packard says. “And you can use a nil-rate band trust to make provision for your children or stepchildren.”

Writing a will with a solicitor costs between £150 and £200. You can buy do-it-yourself kits from stationers such as WH Smith or the Post Office for between £5 and £20, but these can be difficult to complete accurately, particularly if your financial affairs are complicated. Completing the forms wrongly could mean your will is invalid, leaving your estate ruled by the laws of intestacy or open to challenge.


Living Wills

An advance decision, sometimes called a living will, is a set of legally binding instructions that a person draws up to set out what they would like to happen if they lose the capacity to make or communicate healthcare decisions, for example if they are injured in a car crash or suffer an illness such as dementia.

Jo Cartwright, a spokeswoman for Dignity in Dying, says: “They may wish to refuse life sustaining treatment in this case, and want life support to be removed. So they would put in place an advance decision – which can just be a written statement – to make their decision known. This can be lodged with a doctor and a copy kept with a family member.”

She adds that this could be used as a standalone document or to compliment the lasting powers of attorney (LPA), which you can set up to cover your health and welfare as well as financial affairs. An LPA is a legal document giving decision making powers on healthcare, property and finance, to a friend or family member. Like an advance decision, this can also be put in place in advance of a loss of capacity and enacted at a later date.

Go to the government’s site for more information; you can get an advance decision pack from dignityindying.org.uk costing £25, or by calling 020 7479 7737.


The law in Scotland

For people with Scottish roots or other connections, the situation regarding wills is more complicated, writes Neasa MacErlean. While Scots can leave their land and buildings to whoever they like, there are provisions ensuring that spouses and children get a share in their “moveable” property – cash, shares and other assets. These inheritance rules apply in Scotland to people who die without a will and also overrule a will that tries to exclude spouses or offspring.

If there is no will, a Scottish widow or widower would get the first £300,000 of a house as well as the first £24,000 of assets such as furniture, and then £42,000 of cash if there were children or £75,000 if there weren’t.

Then there are so-called “legal rights” which apply whether there is a will or not. The widow or widower would also be entitled to claim “legal rights” to half of any other moveable assets, or a third of those assets if there were children.

The estate of a Scot who died in London, say, would be governed by Scottish law if it was clear that he intended to live in Scotland again. If, however, he had made England his permanent home, all his estate – including any assets in Scotland – would then be governed by English law.

Life after death: Where your money goes if you die without a will

I am single Your estate will be shared equally among any children you have. If you don’t have children it will be divided between your parents, and if your parents are dead between your siblings.

If you have no immediate family, half-brothers or half-sisters followed by grandparents and then any aunts or uncles will inherit. If you have none of these, everything will go to the crown.

I live with my partner, but we are not married Things might have moved on when it comes to equality for unmarried couples, but not as far as dying without a will is concerned. The Treasury will treat you as though you are single so your estate will be distributed in the same way as above. This is why it is particularly important to draw up a will if you want your partner to inherit.

I am married If your estate – including your home – is worth less than £125,000 (£250,000 from 1 February), your spouse will inherit everything. If it is worth more and you have any children, from this marriage or a previous one, your spouse will get the first £125,000 (£250,000 from 1 February) and life interest in half the remainder. The children share the rest. If there are no children your spouse will get the first £200,000 (rising to £400,000 on 1 February) and half the remainder. Your parents will share the rest. If your parents have died, any brothers, sisters, nephews and nieces will share the rest. If there are none your spouse inherits everything.

Source: www.makingawill.org.uk

  • Writing a will
  • Inheritance tax
  • Tax
guardian.co.uk ? Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Watchdog sniffs at Southeastern’s high-speed fares

Monday, June 1st, 2009

Passenger Focus criticises the cost of travel on the new Kent commuter service, where tickets will cost up to a third more

The rail passenger watchdog has criticised Britain’s first high-speed commuter service after it emerged that fares will cost up to a third more than on conventional routes.

Southeastern will charge £24.30 for a return fare from Ebbsfleet International in Kent to St Pancras in central London – an increase of 34% on the current service. A weekly travelcard from Ashford International to St Pancras will be 20% more expensive than the current service at £113.40 a week.

Charles Horton, Southeastern’s managing director, said the fares applied to preview services only. “We feel they offer value for money for passengers who will now be able to get to London in 37 minutes from Ashford and just 17 minutes from Ebbsfleet,” he said.

Passenger Focus, the rail user watchdog, welcomed the service, which will run preview services for the public from 29 June, but expressed concerns over the fare increases.

“We would hope Southeastern would consider offering incentives and discounts to make the service more affordable,” said Tunde Olatunji, Passenger Focus manager for Kent. “Ultimately, passengers now have a choice of a much faster service but at a higher price. Passengers will use Southeastern’s high-speed service if they believe it offers value for money.”

Passenger Focus has urged the government to consider pumping more subsidy into the railways after warning that fares on some routes are the most expensive in Europe. Commuters will receive some respite next year, when deflation will push down the cost of season tickets on most franchises. But Southeastern will be better protected from fare cuts because it is allowed to impose higher price increases than other operators.

However, the company has expressed fears that the high-speed route, which is a key part of its business plan, will raise less revenue than expected due to the recession.

  • Consumer affairs
  • Transport policy
  • Rail travel
guardian.co.uk ? Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds