Posts Tagged ‘bank’

Fear of pension crisis grows as workers raid savings

Wednesday, June 10th, 2009

Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2009/jun/10/hsbc-pensions-survey

International survey suggests more than 20% are dipping into nest-eggs to pay down debt

More than 20% of the world’s workers have dipped into their savings to pay down debt and 13% have stopped saving altogether, according to a study of retirement trends over the past year.

In Britain, China, India and the US, the study suggests, savings have taken a back seat to maintaining living standards threatened by the global downturn.

According to research by HSBC, almost nine out of 10 people feel they are unprepared for retirement, and three-quarters do not know what income they can expect when they stop working.

Even in countries where the population is relatively young, there is a degree of panic among legislators keen to prepare for the day when over-65s outnumber schoolchildren. According to HSBC’s head of insurance, Clive Bannister, China is drafting plans for a nationwide scheme based on an occupational pension model established in Hong Kong. At the moment, most Chinese workers fall outside the limited number of occupational schemes and must rely for a retirement income on younger family members or their own small savings.

Last year, Britain reached the point at which 65-year-olds outnumbered 16-year-olds.

Bannister said the report, which was based on interviews with 15,000 people in 15 countries, showed there was a “downturn deficit” that the state alone could not solve. He said: “the recession means that people are worrying more about surviving from day-to-day than they are concerned about the future”.

He added that the situation in fast-growing economies such as India and China was more difficult. “We can see the state retreating across the globe as the number of older people increases quite dramatically. There simply won’t be enough workers to support a retired population through taxation. In emerging economies, falling state benefits means that, more than elsewhere, individuals must look after themselves.”

The last six months has seen a severe downturn in projections for retirement savings after a torrid two years for world stock markets and steep declines in interest rates. The problem is compounded by increases in life expectancy in most countries that mean pension planning must be extended to cope with a longer retirement.

Several countries, including Britain, have sought to raise the retirement age, but the burden of working longer has, in the main, been shifted by the current generation of over-50s to younger workers.

Previous HSBC studies have shown that workers from China to Britain expect to work beyond the age when they receive state pensions. But while many workers will remain fit enough to keep working into their 70s, others will find that they are unable to carry on and could fall into poverty.

The reluctance to save in the downturn adds to the “unpreparedness gap” being felt in every major economy, the bank said.

Stephen Green, the bank’s chairman, said: “A perfect storm is confronting pensions planning, created by an ageing population, falling pension fund values, a drop in state and employer contributions and an economic downturn which is forcing people to make financial choices.”

Green wants governments to support education schemes and financial advice centres for workers to make informed choices about their retirement planning.

  • Pensions
  • Occupational pensions
  • State pensions
  • Financial crisis
  • Global recession
  • HSBC
guardian.co.uk ? Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Government faces heat on fuel poverty

Tuesday, June 9th, 2009

Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2009/jun/10/fuel-poverty-energy

Select committee claims ministers are failing millions of vulnerable families and demands urgent action on fuel poverty

The government was today urged to offer more help to the millions of families in fuel poverty due to rising energy prices.

The Environment, Food and Rural Affairs select committee said ministers had failed to meet statutory obligations to end fuel poverty and called on them to set up an action plan to help people struggling with energy bills as a matter of urgency.

It warned the resources available for tackling fuel poverty were “inadequate and getting worse”. Anyone spending at least 10% of their income on heating and lighting their home is deemed to be living in fuel poverty. In a series of recommendations, the select committee called for the winter fuel payment to be no longer given to people paying higher-rate tax. Instead it wants the money to fund energy efficiency programmes aimed at helping the fuel poor and vulnerable households.

It also called on the government to consolidate its range of energy efficiency programmes into one comprehensive scheme to upgrade all homes in England, with the improvements delivered by local authorities.

Committee chairman Michael Jack, said: “We need action and clarity – not further consultation – to tackle the three elements that drive fuel poverty: prices, income and energy efficiency levels.

“The government must act swiftly to bring forward practical measures before next winter, using technologies that are already well understood, to help the millions of households that remain in fuel poverty.”

The committee said the Warm Front programme, the government’s main scheme to help vulnerable households cut their energy bills, should have its budget increased and that it should be extended to include all hard-to-treat properties.

It recommended a central budget be created into which energy companies pay their carbon emissions reduction target contributions, so the cash could be pooled with money from other programmes to fund home upgrades.

Energy regulator Ofgem should be ordered to ensure energy companies tell customers about social tariffs and who is eligible for them, to help increase competition for certain customers, such as those who use pre-payment meters, it said.

Jonathan Stearn, energy expert for Consumer Focus, said it was “outrageous” that there were still more than 5 million vulnerable households struggling to afford to heat and power their homes.

He added: “The government’s energy efficiency schemes are simply not up to scratch. Immediate investment is needed in a radical and co-ordinated action plan if we are to lift millions of the poorest pensioners, families and disabled people out of fuel poverty and cut carbon emissions.”

Michelle Mitchell, charity director for Age Concern and Help the Aged, said: “The report sounds a loud wake-up call for the government, whose strategy to tackle fuel poverty is miles away from reaching its targets.

“Ministers should immediately set out to implement the committee’s recommendations, reviewing the Warm Front Scheme and producing a new ‘road map’ to bring home a more ambitious energy efficiency plan.

“Focusing the winter fuel payment on fuel-poor households could give an edge to the government’s strategy to tackle fuel poverty, as long as the system required to implement it is simple and workable.”

Campaigners say the number of householders in fuel poverty has been one of Labour’s greatest failures. In March last year, its own advisers, the Fuel Poverty Advisory Group, said the government appeared to have given up trying to hit its legally binding target to reduce fuel poverty. The group criticised ministers for cutting the grants programme aimed at those in fuel poverty by a quarter during the comprehensive spending review.

This, it said, was despite the Treasury receiving significantly higher VAT receipts on the back of gas and electricity prices which have doubled in recent years.

  • Energy bills
  • Household bills
  • Poverty
  • Consumer affairs
guardian.co.uk ? Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Lloyds to close C&G branches

Tuesday, June 9th, 2009

Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2009/jun/09/lloyds-cheltenham-gloucester-close

• The latest round of cuts will see the demise of 1,600 jobs
• Unite condemns the move as ‘nothing short of disgraceful’

The entire Cheltenham & Gloucester branch network is to close by November, as Lloyds Banking Group cuts another 1,660 jobs after the merger with HBOS.

The bank, which yesterday began repaying its multibillion-pound loan from the taxpayer, confirmed this lunchtime that all 164 C&G branches will shut within five months. This will mean about 1,000 employees will lose their jobs.

Lloyds is also cutting 265 positions across its personal loans division, which will lead to job losses in Chester and Cardiff, with other jobs also going across its retail, personal finance and mortgage sales operations.

The Unite union attacked the move as “nothing short of disgraceful”. It will mean the end of the C&G name on the high street after more than 150 years, but the brand will continue to exist on mortgages sold through brokers.

News of the closures broke this morning, sending Lloyds scrambling to inform C&G staff of the plan and sparking fierce debate online.

One branch worker said that C&G customers should not panic, as “branches will not close for months”. From November, they will have to use one of Lloyds’ 1,800 remaining branches.

Lloyds said that compulsory redundancy would be “a last resort” if it could not find new roles for those affected.

“It is always difficult to make decisions about our business that affect our colleagues,” said Helen Weir, Lloyds’ group executive director for retail banking. “We will work through these changes carefully and sensitively and continue to consult closely with our unions throughout the process.

“Cheltenham & Gloucester is a very strong brand. The strategic focus for C&G from now on will be to further strengthen its intermediary and direct savings businesses. Another major priority for us is to ensure that we manage the closure of the C&G branch network so that it causes as little disruption as possible to our customers. We have a number of measures in place to achieve this.”

Lloyds has already eliminated about 3,000 positions since finalising the takeover of HBOS. Last week it announced 510 job losses across its retail banking arm. It has also decided to drop the Clerical Medical name, which was part of HBOS, with the loss of 300 jobs.

Lloyds employs 140,000 people, and City experts believe 25,000 jobs could eventually go once HBOS is fully integrated.

Unite had already called on Lloyds to end the uncertainty hanging over its workers. Its general secretary, Derek Simpson, warned this morning that closing the C&G network would “rip the heart out of hundreds of local communities up and down the country”.

“Hundreds of staff who have worked hard for years to make the C&G brand a success will view this news as a kick in the teeth,” he said. “UK taxpayers have not poured billions of pounds into this organisation just to see it sack thousands of hard-working people.

“Front-line staff in banks across the country are blameless for the mistakes of management which have brought the important finance industry to the point of collapse. Yet these workers now face an uncertain future as Lloyds abandons C&G’s high street branches. This is truly a dark day for the financial services sector in this country.”

C&G was founded in 1850 in Cheltenham, and was acquired by Lloyds in 1995.

Industry experts had predicted several months ago that Lloyds might drop C&G in favour of Halifax, which is the UK’s biggest mortgage lender and is perceived to be a stronger brand.

Alex Potter, banking analyst at Collins Stewart, believes the closure of the C&G branch network could be an attempt to prevent the European Commission blocking the merger. Shares in Lloyds plunged by a third on 20 May after the bank warned shareholders that it may be forced to slim down its business to win state aid approval from the commission.

“There are still antitrust concerns about the Lloyds-HBOS merger at commission level,” Potter told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme. “Perhaps this is a sop to the regulators.”

Lloyds launched its takeover of HBOS last autumn after the government said it would waive competition rules that would otherwise have made the deal impossible.

Cuts at RBS

Unite also said today that 500 staff at RBS have been told that they are at risk of redundancy.

“The closure of a cash centre in Glasgow impacting around 140 staff and 360 job losses throughout other UK locations will devastate staff. Unite is opposed to compulsory job losses and through continued consultation with the bank will seek to find suitable alternative employment for workers,” said Unite national officer Rob McGregor.

These cutbacks are part of the wide-ranging cutbacks announced in April by RBS, which plans to cut its UK workforce by 4,500.

  • Lloyds Banking Group
  • Banking
  • Job losses
  • Trade unions
  • Financial crisis
  • HBOS
  • Redundancy
guardian.co.uk ? Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Lloyds to close C&G branches

Tuesday, June 9th, 2009

Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2009/jun/09/lloyds-cheltenham-gloucester-close

• The latest round of cuts will see the demise of 1,600 jobs
• Unite condemns the move as ‘nothing short of disgraceful’

The entire Cheltenham & Gloucester branch network is to close by November, as Lloyds Banking Group cuts another 1,660 jobs after the merger with HBOS.

The bank, which yesterday began repaying its multibillion-pound loan from the taxpayer, confirmed this lunchtime that all 164 C&G branches will shut within five months. This will mean about 1,000 employees will lose their jobs.

Lloyds is also cutting 265 positions across its personal loans division, which will lead to job losses in Chester and Cardiff, with other jobs also going across its retail, personal finance and mortgage sales operations.

The Unite union attacked the move as “nothing short of disgraceful”. It will mean the end of the C&G name on the high street after more than 150 years, but the brand will continue to exist on mortgages sold through brokers.

News of the closures broke this morning, sending Lloyds scrambling to inform C&G staff of the plan and sparking fierce debate online.

One branch worker said that C&G customers should not panic, as “branches will not close for months”. From November, they will have to use one of Lloyds’ 1,800 remaining branches.

Lloyds said that compulsory redundancy would be “a last resort” if it could not find new roles for those affected.

“It is always difficult to make decisions about our business that affect our colleagues,” said Helen Weir, Lloyds’ group executive director for retail banking. “We will work through these changes carefully and sensitively and continue to consult closely with our unions throughout the process.

“Cheltenham & Gloucester is a very strong brand. The strategic focus for C&G from now on will be to further strengthen its intermediary and direct savings businesses. Another major priority for us is to ensure that we manage the closure of the C&G branch network so that it causes as little disruption as possible to our customers. We have a number of measures in place to achieve this.”

Lloyds has already eliminated about 3,000 positions since finalising the takeover of HBOS. Last week it announced 510 job losses across its retail banking arm. It has also decided to drop the Clerical Medical name, which was part of HBOS, with the loss of 300 jobs.

Lloyds employs 140,000 people, and City experts believe 25,000 jobs could eventually go once HBOS is fully integrated.

Unite had already called on Lloyds to end the uncertainty hanging over its workers. Its general secretary, Derek Simpson, warned this morning that closing the C&G network would “rip the heart out of hundreds of local communities up and down the country”.

“Hundreds of staff who have worked hard for years to make the C&G brand a success will view this news as a kick in the teeth,” he said. “UK taxpayers have not poured billions of pounds into this organisation just to see it sack thousands of hard-working people.

“Front-line staff in banks across the country are blameless for the mistakes of management which have brought the important finance industry to the point of collapse. Yet these workers now face an uncertain future as Lloyds abandons C&G’s high street branches. This is truly a dark day for the financial services sector in this country.”

C&G was founded in 1850 in Cheltenham, and was acquired by Lloyds in 1995.

Industry experts had predicted several months ago that Lloyds might drop C&G in favour of Halifax, which is the UK’s biggest mortgage lender and is perceived to be a stronger brand.

Alex Potter, banking analyst at Collins Stewart, believes the closure of the C&G branch network could be an attempt to prevent the European Commission blocking the merger. Shares in Lloyds plunged by a third on 20 May after the bank warned shareholders that it may be forced to slim down its business to win state aid approval from the commission.

“There are still antitrust concerns about the Lloyds-HBOS merger at commission level,” Potter told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme. “Perhaps this is a sop to the regulators.”

Lloyds launched its takeover of HBOS last autumn after the government said it would waive competition rules that would otherwise have made the deal impossible.

Cuts at RBS

Unite also said today that 500 staff at RBS have been told that they are at risk of redundancy.

“The closure of a cash centre in Glasgow impacting around 140 staff and 360 job losses throughout other UK locations will devastate staff. Unite is opposed to compulsory job losses and through continued consultation with the bank will seek to find suitable alternative employment for workers,” said Unite national officer Rob McGregor.

These cutbacks are part of the wide-ranging cutbacks announced in April by RBS, which plans to cut its UK workforce by 4,500.

  • Lloyds Banking Group
  • Banking
  • Job losses
  • Trade unions
  • Financial crisis
  • HBOS
  • Redundancy
guardian.co.uk ? Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Snooping around

Friday, June 5th, 2009

From a Chelsea wreck to a dream home in Cornwall

Five ways to save on … Current accounts

Friday, June 5th, 2009

Bank charges getting you down? Follow our five steps to happiness

1 Ditch your packaged or ‘premium’ account

Most banks offer one or more “added value” accounts that charge a monthly fee. Lloyds TSB has four, starting with Silver – £95.49 a year (£85.50 in year one) which includes mobile phone insurance,­ card protection and European­ travel insurance – and going up to Premier at £300 a year (£284 in year one), which throws in worldwide travel insurance, a £500 interest-free overdraft and home emergency cover.

Maybe you could buy the benefits cheaper elsewhere. If you’re paying more than £80 for an account­ mainly for its free travel insurance­, bear in mind annual comprehensive worldwide policies, with winter sports cover, can be found for around £40 per person or £60 for the family if you check any major price comparison website.

It’s easy to cancel an account­ – contact your bank, ignore its protestations and insist staff make the change.

2 Clean up your direct debits

Ask your bank for a full list of standing orders, direct debits and recurring payments and go through it. Many people carry on paying direct debits for items they no longer need.

Beware “recurring” or “continuous authority” payments (used by some mobile phone companies, broadband providers and many pornography websites) where a subscription is taken from your credit card. These are ­extraordinarily difficult to cancel.

3 Switch accounts to get a better deal

Shopping around for value has become second nature for credit cards, motor insurance and home contents cover but not, it seems, when it comes to current accounts. Despite the perceived­ hassle, switching is relatively­ easy. Take a look at the best-buy current account tables at Moneyfacts.co.uk and gauge how your account measures up.

If you rarely – if ever – go overdrawn, the best-buy in-credit interest accounts include Alliance & Leicester’s Premier Direct account, requiring monthly funding of at least £500, and Abbey’s Preferred In-Credit Rate account,­ requiring funding of £1,000 a month, both of which pay 4.89% gross on balances up to £2,500 for the first 12 months, dropping to 1% after a year.

Also competitive is Lloyds TSB’s Classic Plus, requiring funding of £1,000 a month, which pays 2.47%. And worth considering, particularly if you tend to deplete your account within days of bunging in your pay cheque, is Bank of Scotland’s Reward account which, instead of paying interest based on a daily calculation of how much is in your account, gives you £5 every month you put in £1,000.

If you regularly spend more than you earn, you’ll want an account with a?low rate for authorised overdrafts. Best is Alliance & Leicester’s Premier Direct which offers an interest and fee-free overdraft for the first 12 months after which, instead of interest, it charges 50p per day – maximum £5 per month – on authorised overdrafts. Other low authorised overdraft rates include 9.74% on Norwich & Peterborough’s Gold account and the 11.8% imposed by Cahoot’s current account.

4 Get £100 for moving

You’ve just missed the chance of £100 to switch to Alliance & Leicester – the deal expired on 28 May. But First Direct’s offer of £100 to move to its current account, plus £100 if you decide it’s not up to scratch and close it after 12 months, is still up for grabs. It pays no credit interest and has an authorised overdraft rate of 15.9%. You need to be a new customer to the bank and to transfer a salary or income of at least £1,500 per month into the account within three months of opening it, upon which First Direct will add £100. If you are not satisfied after 12 months then, provided you’ve paid in at least £1,500 a month for six months, the bank says it will give you another £100 and help you move your account.


5 Don’t go into the red without asking permission

The vast majority of current accounts charge a lot more interest and/or fees for going overdrawn without authorisation than they do if you’ve arranged an overdraft facility. On the Abbey current account, you can choose a preferred in-credit rate or a preferred overdraft rate. If you opt for the latter, the rate is 12.9% (0% for the first year if you’ve switched from another bank). If, however, you go into the red and exceed your authorised limit, the rate rockets to 28.7%, on top of which you’ll have to pay £25 per month.

  • Current accounts
  • Banks and building societies
guardian.co.uk ? Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Abbey’s flexible mortgage slash and grab

Friday, June 5th, 2009

Overpay into your flexible account and spend the ‘available funds’ on anything you want – the problem is, all that saved money can be wiped out

Abbey was this week accused of “unfairly” slashing the value of homes, and using this as an excuse to “grab” thousands of pounds that its mortgage customers had stashed away for the future.

In the last few weeks, many Abbey flexible­ mortgage holders have received a bombshell letter telling them that ­because of falling house prices, the bank has reduced the estimated value of their property.

That has a dramatic impact on the way people use the mortgage. In some cases it means thousands of pounds paid into their account – which they were perhaps hoping to dip into at a later date – has suddenly been whipped away. That means they are unable to access this money, which they might have been planning to use for a holiday or new car. It is thought as many as 8,000 people have received letters telling them that some, or all, of this cash has been removed. Justin Cuckow is one; he claims the Spanish-owned bank has behaved “outrageously”.

By making a number of overpayments, he had built up £10,300 of what Abbey calls “available funds”, that he could use in future to take a payment holiday or pay less each month, or to spend on whatever he wanted.

He thought he was behaving prudently­ by shovelling in the extra cash. So he was shocked to receive a letter a few days ago telling him that, as part of a review of all Abbey’s flexible mortgage accounts, the bank had reduced the estimated value of his flat from £143,000 to £130,000. That automatically reduced his credit limit by a similar amount, “which reduces your available funds to £0.00″. The letter then rubbed salt in the wound: “Please note that if house prices increase in the future, we will not automatically increase your credit limit.”

In other words, the £10,300 that Cuckow had carefully built up has been removed at a stroke.

Abbey has around 200,000 flexible mortgage customers. These deals give you the freedom to overpay when you want to, then underpay or take a break from your monthly payments if your circumstances change. But with Northern Rock also tightening up the rules on its flexible mortgages, some of these deals are looking a lot less user-friendly now that the economic backdrop isn’t so rosy. Ray Boulger at broker John Charcol says if borrowers don’t have confidence that they can use these home loans in the way they expect, “it destroys the whole concept of having that type of mortgage”.

It doesn’t help that Abbey’s flexible loan is a pretty complex beast. It is made up of three parts – the mortgage loan, a savings pot, and your “available funds”. The available funds are the difference between what you’ve borrowed (ie, the loan) and the maximum you are allowed to borrow (your credit limit). Abbey describes this facility as like an overdraft; you can “draw down” funds up to the maximum as needed. If you overpay, you can put this money into your savings pot, which is offset against the loan, or do what Cuckow did – pay it off your mortgage,­ thereby increasing the available­ funds.

He was surprised to discover the new figure for what his one-bedroom flat is allegedly worth was an automated valuation­ based on Halifax’s house price index­, which Abbey said, “provides us with an updated estimate each quarter of the purchase price of properties in your region”.

After Cuckow complained, Abbey dispatched a surveyor to carry out a formal valuation, which put the value at £145,000 – some £15,000 more than the original valuation (and £2,000 more than he paid for it), and suggests the bank was wrong to swipe all his available funds.

“The basis they use for valuing properties is seriously flawed – it’s massively undervaluing,” says Cuckow, who lives in Horsham, West Sussex, and works in emergency planning for a local authority. He claims Abbey’s aim seems to be “to take the risk off their books by grabbing any available funds,” adding: “This mortgage has never been more affordable – it’s a tracker at 0.49% above base rate – and I’ve never missed a repayment.”

Abbey told us it regularly reviews people’s credit limits in line with house prices, to ensure the mortgage balance and available funds do not, together, amount to more than 90% of the property’s current market value.

“Where it does, we reserve the right – as clearly stated in the terms and conditions – to withdraw any available balance over the 90% LTV limit which is not being used,” its spokeswoman says. “This is a policy we have had for a number of years, and is in line with our prudent and responsible approach to lending. It protects the customer by ensuring they do not end up with negative equity.”

She added that in Cuckow’s case, “the payments he has made have been capital repayments, not money saved into his savings pot, and so has reduced the overall balance of his mortgage. We have, as promised, carried out a valuation of Mr Cuckow’s property … he understands that if he wants to make additional payments, he should make these to his savings pot and not as capital reductions.”

Cuckow’s mortgage account has now been rejigged to reflect the new valuation, and his available funds restored to their previous level. But he is taking no chances. “I’ve moved the full balance into a separate savings account where Abbey can’t get its hands on it.”

What is a flexible mortgage?

Many mortgages now come with flexible features, such as the ability to make overpayments, take a payment holiday or pay less each month. And some deals offer an “offset” facility, where you use your savings cash to reduce the amount of interest you pay on your mortgage.

Earlier this year, the Co-operative Bank issued figures showing that the number of home loan customers making overpayments had increased by 50% in the last year. Many had decided to pay more because their mortgage rate had plummeted as a result of Bank of England interest rate cuts. Low savings rates are another reason why it can make financial sense. In the past, when house prices have been rising, flexible mortgages were a controversy-free zone.

But Justin Cuckow’s experience indicates that if you have got a flexible/offset home loan, or are planning to get one, it is worth checking the small print to see if there is anything that could come back to haunt you if house prices were to continue falling.

Ray Boulger, at mortgage broker John Charcol, says: “In general, I would say any overpayments you are in a position to make, should always be paid into the linked savings or current account rather than into the mortgage.”

  • Mortgages
  • Property
  • Borrowing & debt
guardian.co.uk ? Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Cash Isa rates tumble

Thursday, June 4th, 2009

• Barclays cuts rates to 0.1% on some cash Isas
• Savers warned best rates may not last long

Savers are being warned to check the interest paid on their individual savings accounts following a move by Barclays to slash the rates as low as 0.1% on some of its older accounts.

Loyal customers who have more than £18,000 accumulated in the bank’s variable-rate mini cash Isa have had their interest chopped from 0.31% to 0.1%. Those with less than £18,000 in the account were already earning 0.1%.

Barclays will continue to pay 3.61% AER to existing customers with its Golden Isa, a rate that includes a 1% bonus, but has disposed of the bonus for new savers.

A spokeswoman for Barclays said people stuck in the ultra-low earning Isa could not switch to the Golden Isa, as it did not accept transfers. However she denied Barclays was treating its loyal customers shabbily.

She said: “We are making some minor alterations to the interest rates in our current range, the vast majority of our savers will not be impacted.

“Our savings products have and continue to be very successful with MoreForMore and Monthly Savings being leading rates. We continue to review the rates on our range of saving accounts in tandem with market conditions to ensure they are fairly and competitively priced.”

She added that savers who wanted to switch out of an old Isa should speak to the bank about their options.

Barclays is not alone in cutting savings rates. Although the Bank of England monetary policy committee today held the base rate at 0.5%, several banks and building societies are reducing the amount they pay on deposits.

Andrew Hagger of Moneynet.co.uk said: “We’re only two months into the new tax year, yet some of the more attractive cash Isa accounts have, in the last seven days, either had their rates slashed or been withdrawn completely.”

In addition to swingeing cuts to Barclays Isas, Halifax has pulled its Direct Reward Isa, which paid 3% fixed for 12 months, while First Direct has chopped the interest on its e-ISA account from 3.06% to a fixed rate of 1.98%.

Last month, NatWest cut the rate it paid on its attractive e-Isa by 1% and withdrew its Cash Isa Plus – both were at or near the best rates on offer, paying more than 3.5% in most cases. NatWest’s e-Isa now pays 2.25% on balances up to £9,999 and 2.5% on savings above £10,000. .

Hagger said: “It’s starting to look as if some providers may have reached their targets for Isa deposits already and are content to offer a poorer deal to those who have been slow off the mark.

“So if you haven’t invested your Isa cash for 2009-10, even though there are still 10 months still to run in this tax year, it may be prudent to make your choice sooner rather than later, before some of the other top deals disappear too.”

  • Isas
  • Savings
  • Interest rates
  • Interest rates
guardian.co.uk ? Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

‘Your CV is exceptional … exceptionally bad, that is’

Thursday, June 4th, 2009

Last night’s Apprentice interviews were cringeworthy for many reasons, not least the interviewers’ performances. Have you ever endured a grilling from hell, asks Huma Qureshi

Oh dear, where on earth do we start when it comes to last night’s interview-round Apprentice? The penultimate episode of the series showed the candidates facing a grilling from Surallun’s cronies: Claude Littner (the bald cruel one), Bordan Tkachuk (the one with the spiky beard), Karren “nobody-calls-me-a-bitch” Brady, and Alan Watts (some lawyer we know nothing about).

It had it all: lies, profanities, bitchiness, tears and, well, just plain silliness (poor James. Still, he sort of had it coming, what with his Willy Wonka comment and all that).

Yet, despite their blips and blunders, you still had to feel sorry for this year’s lot. Lets face it, who would want to be interviewed by someone like cruel Claude? And who wouldn’t be rattled by an interviewer waving your finances in front of your face telling you your accounts are wrong?

Granted, an interview is not meant to be easy and you’re not there to make friends, but Claude is still one tough man to impress. “Your CV is exceptional,” he told James, who was so visibly relieved he actually closed his mouth. “Exceptionally bad, that is.” (James’s jaw promptly dropped again). Talk about leading you up the garden path.

Ditto with Karren. There she is one minute amiably chatting away with each of the girls, luring them in with her smiles, and then bang! The killer question disguised as a nicety. She caught out Lorraine’s CV lie and even managed to fluster head girl-material Kate.

But never mind the candidates, how did The Apprentice interviewers do in assessing the candidates? Not very well according to our in-house HR team:

“Interviews should be conducted to give people the best chance to showcase their skills and experience. Starting an interview [Lorraine's] by saying ‘you are clearly delusional’ is not only an assumption but it is offensive – the interviewer started the candidate off completely on the wrong foot.

“The best interviewers do not make assumptions, they collect evidence. And last night’s interviews were riddled with people making assumptions based on very little information.?

“As for ‘catching out candidates’, yes an interviewer has a responsibility to check the facts but there is no excuse to do this by interrogation and rudeness.?Any company who wants to attract talent should ensure their interviewers are professional, precise and also represent the company (would anyone want to work for a company who values Claude’s interpersonal skills?).”

What do you think? Have you ever thought an interview was going well only for the interviewer to turn around and tell you otherwise? Or have you been let down by an interviewer who didn’t give you a chance to explain yourself?

  • Work & careers
  • The Apprentice
  • Reality TV
  • Television
guardian.co.uk ? Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Car sales slump for 13th month in a row

Thursday, June 4th, 2009

Motor industry says it will take time for government’s scrappage scheme to make an impact

New car sales fell sharply last month, with the motor industry saying that it would take time for the government’s “cash for bangers” scrappage scheme to take effect.

A total of 134,858 new vehicles were registered in May 2009 – 24.8% down on the May 2008 total, the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders (SMMT) reported today.

This was the 13th successive month that sales had dropped and registrations for the first five months of this year were down 27.9% compared with January-May 2008.

Also today, a survey by the Retail Motor Industry Federation (RMIF) showed that more than 92% of car dealers have reported an increase in inquiries about new vehicles following the launch of the scrappage scheme.

The survey showed:

• 48.5% of the vehicles being bought under the scheme are priced £6,000-£8,000, with 22.1% priced £8,000-£10,000.

• 66.9% of the vehicles being purchased in the initiative have 1.0-1.3 litre engines and 19.1% have 1.3 -1.6 litre engines.

• 63.7% of those buying under the scheme are aged 45-60 and 27.1% are aged 31-45.

RMIF director Sue Robinson said: “Car sales should see a significant increase in the coming months as a result of the scrappage scheme. This will go a long way towards helping to revive consumer confidence and the UK car market.”

  • Automotive industry
  • Recession
  • Car scrappage
  • Motoring
guardian.co.uk ? Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds