Archive for the ‘home business’ Category

Government faces heat on fuel poverty

Tuesday, June 9th, 2009

Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2009/jun/10/fuel-poverty-energy

Select committee claims ministers are failing millions of vulnerable families and demands urgent action on fuel poverty

The government was today urged to offer more help to the millions of families in fuel poverty due to rising energy prices.

The Environment, Food and Rural Affairs select committee said ministers had failed to meet statutory obligations to end fuel poverty and called on them to set up an action plan to help people struggling with energy bills as a matter of urgency.

It warned the resources available for tackling fuel poverty were “inadequate and getting worse”. Anyone spending at least 10% of their income on heating and lighting their home is deemed to be living in fuel poverty. In a series of recommendations, the select committee called for the winter fuel payment to be no longer given to people paying higher-rate tax. Instead it wants the money to fund energy efficiency programmes aimed at helping the fuel poor and vulnerable households.

It also called on the government to consolidate its range of energy efficiency programmes into one comprehensive scheme to upgrade all homes in England, with the improvements delivered by local authorities.

Committee chairman Michael Jack, said: “We need action and clarity – not further consultation – to tackle the three elements that drive fuel poverty: prices, income and energy efficiency levels.

“The government must act swiftly to bring forward practical measures before next winter, using technologies that are already well understood, to help the millions of households that remain in fuel poverty.”

The committee said the Warm Front programme, the government’s main scheme to help vulnerable households cut their energy bills, should have its budget increased and that it should be extended to include all hard-to-treat properties.

It recommended a central budget be created into which energy companies pay their carbon emissions reduction target contributions, so the cash could be pooled with money from other programmes to fund home upgrades.

Energy regulator Ofgem should be ordered to ensure energy companies tell customers about social tariffs and who is eligible for them, to help increase competition for certain customers, such as those who use pre-payment meters, it said.

Jonathan Stearn, energy expert for Consumer Focus, said it was “outrageous” that there were still more than 5 million vulnerable households struggling to afford to heat and power their homes.

He added: “The government’s energy efficiency schemes are simply not up to scratch. Immediate investment is needed in a radical and co-ordinated action plan if we are to lift millions of the poorest pensioners, families and disabled people out of fuel poverty and cut carbon emissions.”

Michelle Mitchell, charity director for Age Concern and Help the Aged, said: “The report sounds a loud wake-up call for the government, whose strategy to tackle fuel poverty is miles away from reaching its targets.

“Ministers should immediately set out to implement the committee’s recommendations, reviewing the Warm Front Scheme and producing a new ‘road map’ to bring home a more ambitious energy efficiency plan.

“Focusing the winter fuel payment on fuel-poor households could give an edge to the government’s strategy to tackle fuel poverty, as long as the system required to implement it is simple and workable.”

Campaigners say the number of householders in fuel poverty has been one of Labour’s greatest failures. In March last year, its own advisers, the Fuel Poverty Advisory Group, said the government appeared to have given up trying to hit its legally binding target to reduce fuel poverty. The group criticised ministers for cutting the grants programme aimed at those in fuel poverty by a quarter during the comprehensive spending review.

This, it said, was despite the Treasury receiving significantly higher VAT receipts on the back of gas and electricity prices which have doubled in recent years.

  • Energy bills
  • Household bills
  • Poverty
  • Consumer affairs
guardian.co.uk ? Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Lloyds to close C&G branches

Tuesday, June 9th, 2009

Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2009/jun/09/lloyds-cheltenham-gloucester-close

• The latest round of cuts will see the demise of 1,600 jobs
• Unite condemns the move as ‘nothing short of disgraceful’

The entire Cheltenham & Gloucester branch network is to close by November, as Lloyds Banking Group cuts another 1,660 jobs after the merger with HBOS.

The bank, which yesterday began repaying its multibillion-pound loan from the taxpayer, confirmed this lunchtime that all 164 C&G branches will shut within five months. This will mean about 1,000 employees will lose their jobs.

Lloyds is also cutting 265 positions across its personal loans division, which will lead to job losses in Chester and Cardiff, with other jobs also going across its retail, personal finance and mortgage sales operations.

The Unite union attacked the move as “nothing short of disgraceful”. It will mean the end of the C&G name on the high street after more than 150 years, but the brand will continue to exist on mortgages sold through brokers.

News of the closures broke this morning, sending Lloyds scrambling to inform C&G staff of the plan and sparking fierce debate online.

One branch worker said that C&G customers should not panic, as “branches will not close for months”. From November, they will have to use one of Lloyds’ 1,800 remaining branches.

Lloyds said that compulsory redundancy would be “a last resort” if it could not find new roles for those affected.

“It is always difficult to make decisions about our business that affect our colleagues,” said Helen Weir, Lloyds’ group executive director for retail banking. “We will work through these changes carefully and sensitively and continue to consult closely with our unions throughout the process.

“Cheltenham & Gloucester is a very strong brand. The strategic focus for C&G from now on will be to further strengthen its intermediary and direct savings businesses. Another major priority for us is to ensure that we manage the closure of the C&G branch network so that it causes as little disruption as possible to our customers. We have a number of measures in place to achieve this.”

Lloyds has already eliminated about 3,000 positions since finalising the takeover of HBOS. Last week it announced 510 job losses across its retail banking arm. It has also decided to drop the Clerical Medical name, which was part of HBOS, with the loss of 300 jobs.

Lloyds employs 140,000 people, and City experts believe 25,000 jobs could eventually go once HBOS is fully integrated.

Unite had already called on Lloyds to end the uncertainty hanging over its workers. Its general secretary, Derek Simpson, warned this morning that closing the C&G network would “rip the heart out of hundreds of local communities up and down the country”.

“Hundreds of staff who have worked hard for years to make the C&G brand a success will view this news as a kick in the teeth,” he said. “UK taxpayers have not poured billions of pounds into this organisation just to see it sack thousands of hard-working people.

“Front-line staff in banks across the country are blameless for the mistakes of management which have brought the important finance industry to the point of collapse. Yet these workers now face an uncertain future as Lloyds abandons C&G’s high street branches. This is truly a dark day for the financial services sector in this country.”

C&G was founded in 1850 in Cheltenham, and was acquired by Lloyds in 1995.

Industry experts had predicted several months ago that Lloyds might drop C&G in favour of Halifax, which is the UK’s biggest mortgage lender and is perceived to be a stronger brand.

Alex Potter, banking analyst at Collins Stewart, believes the closure of the C&G branch network could be an attempt to prevent the European Commission blocking the merger. Shares in Lloyds plunged by a third on 20 May after the bank warned shareholders that it may be forced to slim down its business to win state aid approval from the commission.

“There are still antitrust concerns about the Lloyds-HBOS merger at commission level,” Potter told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme. “Perhaps this is a sop to the regulators.”

Lloyds launched its takeover of HBOS last autumn after the government said it would waive competition rules that would otherwise have made the deal impossible.

Cuts at RBS

Unite also said today that 500 staff at RBS have been told that they are at risk of redundancy.

“The closure of a cash centre in Glasgow impacting around 140 staff and 360 job losses throughout other UK locations will devastate staff. Unite is opposed to compulsory job losses and through continued consultation with the bank will seek to find suitable alternative employment for workers,” said Unite national officer Rob McGregor.

These cutbacks are part of the wide-ranging cutbacks announced in April by RBS, which plans to cut its UK workforce by 4,500.

  • Lloyds Banking Group
  • Banking
  • Job losses
  • Trade unions
  • Financial crisis
  • HBOS
  • Redundancy
guardian.co.uk ? Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Lloyds to close C&G branches

Tuesday, June 9th, 2009

Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2009/jun/09/lloyds-cheltenham-gloucester-close

• The latest round of cuts will see the demise of 1,600 jobs
• Unite condemns the move as ‘nothing short of disgraceful’

The entire Cheltenham & Gloucester branch network is to close by November, as Lloyds Banking Group cuts another 1,660 jobs after the merger with HBOS.

The bank, which yesterday began repaying its multibillion-pound loan from the taxpayer, confirmed this lunchtime that all 164 C&G branches will shut within five months. This will mean about 1,000 employees will lose their jobs.

Lloyds is also cutting 265 positions across its personal loans division, which will lead to job losses in Chester and Cardiff, with other jobs also going across its retail, personal finance and mortgage sales operations.

The Unite union attacked the move as “nothing short of disgraceful”. It will mean the end of the C&G name on the high street after more than 150 years, but the brand will continue to exist on mortgages sold through brokers.

News of the closures broke this morning, sending Lloyds scrambling to inform C&G staff of the plan and sparking fierce debate online.

One branch worker said that C&G customers should not panic, as “branches will not close for months”. From November, they will have to use one of Lloyds’ 1,800 remaining branches.

Lloyds said that compulsory redundancy would be “a last resort” if it could not find new roles for those affected.

“It is always difficult to make decisions about our business that affect our colleagues,” said Helen Weir, Lloyds’ group executive director for retail banking. “We will work through these changes carefully and sensitively and continue to consult closely with our unions throughout the process.

“Cheltenham & Gloucester is a very strong brand. The strategic focus for C&G from now on will be to further strengthen its intermediary and direct savings businesses. Another major priority for us is to ensure that we manage the closure of the C&G branch network so that it causes as little disruption as possible to our customers. We have a number of measures in place to achieve this.”

Lloyds has already eliminated about 3,000 positions since finalising the takeover of HBOS. Last week it announced 510 job losses across its retail banking arm. It has also decided to drop the Clerical Medical name, which was part of HBOS, with the loss of 300 jobs.

Lloyds employs 140,000 people, and City experts believe 25,000 jobs could eventually go once HBOS is fully integrated.

Unite had already called on Lloyds to end the uncertainty hanging over its workers. Its general secretary, Derek Simpson, warned this morning that closing the C&G network would “rip the heart out of hundreds of local communities up and down the country”.

“Hundreds of staff who have worked hard for years to make the C&G brand a success will view this news as a kick in the teeth,” he said. “UK taxpayers have not poured billions of pounds into this organisation just to see it sack thousands of hard-working people.

“Front-line staff in banks across the country are blameless for the mistakes of management which have brought the important finance industry to the point of collapse. Yet these workers now face an uncertain future as Lloyds abandons C&G’s high street branches. This is truly a dark day for the financial services sector in this country.”

C&G was founded in 1850 in Cheltenham, and was acquired by Lloyds in 1995.

Industry experts had predicted several months ago that Lloyds might drop C&G in favour of Halifax, which is the UK’s biggest mortgage lender and is perceived to be a stronger brand.

Alex Potter, banking analyst at Collins Stewart, believes the closure of the C&G branch network could be an attempt to prevent the European Commission blocking the merger. Shares in Lloyds plunged by a third on 20 May after the bank warned shareholders that it may be forced to slim down its business to win state aid approval from the commission.

“There are still antitrust concerns about the Lloyds-HBOS merger at commission level,” Potter told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme. “Perhaps this is a sop to the regulators.”

Lloyds launched its takeover of HBOS last autumn after the government said it would waive competition rules that would otherwise have made the deal impossible.

Cuts at RBS

Unite also said today that 500 staff at RBS have been told that they are at risk of redundancy.

“The closure of a cash centre in Glasgow impacting around 140 staff and 360 job losses throughout other UK locations will devastate staff. Unite is opposed to compulsory job losses and through continued consultation with the bank will seek to find suitable alternative employment for workers,” said Unite national officer Rob McGregor.

These cutbacks are part of the wide-ranging cutbacks announced in April by RBS, which plans to cut its UK workforce by 4,500.

  • Lloyds Banking Group
  • Banking
  • Job losses
  • Trade unions
  • Financial crisis
  • HBOS
  • Redundancy
guardian.co.uk ? Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

House prices buoyed by property shortage

Tuesday, June 9th, 2009

Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2009/jun/09/rics-house-prices

A combination of rising buyer inquiries and a shortage of homes for sale is supporting house prices, Rics says

Increasing interest from new buyers plus a shortage of properties for sale is helping to stabilise house prices, according to the latest housing market survey from the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (Rics).

Rics’s members said buyer inquiries increased for the seventh month in a row in May, and at the fastest rate since 1999. Estate agents also saw a rise in sales, albeit from very depressed levels. The average number of properties sold over the past three months rose to 11.8, up from 10.6. Fewer surveyors also reported a fall in house prices.

At the same time new instructions have continued to fall: the average number of properties on estate agents’ books has dropped in the past month to 58.4 from 69.4, and by more than a third over the past year.

Rics said the lack of new supply coupled with the increase in activity is providing some support for house prices, but warned there could be further price falls to come. Spokesman Ian Perry said: “The housing market does appear to be close to bottoming out with activity picking up in a material way and prices at last stabilising.

“However, it is important to remember that the lack of supply has been as important in underpinning prices as the rise in demand. Moreover, with the economic backdrop still quite uncertain, unemployment set to continue increasing sharply and finance for first-time buyers still in short supply, there are a number of significant obstacles for the market to overcome over the coming months.”

The findings from Rics were supported by house price figures published today by the government’s communities department , which showed prices rose by 1.1% month-on-month in April, after dropping 1.3% in March. This means the year-on-year fall in house prices narrowed to 13% in April from 13.6% in March.

In London, the improving market is being driven by first-time buyers who have built up equity over the past two years, or who have been lent deposits by their parents, taking advantage of lower prices, according to estate agent Ludlow Thompson.

Director, Stephen Ludlow, said: “Sentiment has changed considerably – at the end of last year nobody could see a floor for prices. Whilst prices may not have reached the very bottom buyers are no longer worried that the market is still in meltdown mode.

“The pickup in demand in May was so sudden that it has been the lack of supply of properties actually on the market that caused the bounce in prices. We’ve had to move lettings staff on to sales to deal with the surge in activity.”

However, Howard Archer, chief UK and European economist for IHS Global Insight, said he remained sceptical that house prices had bottomed out.

“It is not uncommon for there to be months of rising prices when house prices are still trending down. Most recently, the Halifax reported that house prices rose by 2% month-on-month in January but then fell sharply during February-April before rising again in May.

“Housing market activity is still very low by past norms and at a level consistent with falling house prices, and despite markedly rising buyer interest we believe that the pickup in actual house purchases is likely to be gradual and fitful for some time to come.”

  • House prices
  • Property
  • First-time buyers
  • Housing market
guardian.co.uk ? Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Make Money With eBooks

Tuesday, June 9th, 2009

If you are looking to earn money online you should look into ebooks. You can make money with ebooks a variety of ways

Here is the original:
Make Money With eBooks

Homebuyer interest up while retail sales drop

Monday, June 8th, 2009

Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2009/jun/09/retail-sector-june2009-economy

Shop sales fell back last month in spite of growing optimism that the recession may be coming to an end, with retailers reporting that market conditions remain “extremely challenging,” the British Retail Consortium reports today.

The BRC’s latest monthly report shows that retail sales on a like-for-like basis – which excludes the effect of changes in floor space – fell 0.8% in May compared to May 2008, which was a strong month.

“Negative results show spring has been extremely difficult for most non-food retailers. The turnaround in sales of big-ticket items such as furniture and large electricals, which would indicate real change in the mood of customers, still eludes us,” said BRC director-general Stephen Robertson.

Helen Dickinson, head of retail at the report’s sponsors KPMG, said: “These figures may look disappointing after last month’s positive results were flattered by the timing of Easter, but extremely challenging market conditions – particularly for the non-food sectors – continue.

“We might have expected better figures as, while there are consumers struggling financially due to actual, or the prospect of, job losses, there are also those with greater disposable income due to lower mortgage payments, easing inflation and lower fuel costs. It remains to be seen when those who have cash to spare will feel confident to start spending again.”

The survey showed that clothing and footwear fell below last May’s strong sales while big-ticket homewares and furniture sales remained “difficult”.

Further evidence that the economy remains under pressure came from a survey by recruitment specialists Manpower showing that employers’ hiring plans have fallen to their lowest in 17 years, although the pace of decline has slowed.

Its quarterly survey of 2,100 firms show that the majority expect to maintain their staffing levels in the third quarter of the year, rather than reduce them further or increase them. This would explain why young people leaving school or university have found it so difficult to get a job.

The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors reports today that new house buyer interest rose for the seventh consecutive month in May. Sales also rose, albeit from very depressed levels, indicating that the increase in footfall of potential buyers is steadily improving activity in the housing market, RICS said.

The net balance of surveyors reporting a fall in house prices rose from a negative balance of 59% to 44%, the best result since November 2007. The survey still suggests prices are falling, though, in contrast to reports of rises from the Nationwide and Halifax for last month.

RICS spokesman Ian Perry said: “On the face of it, the housing market does appear to be close to bottoming out with activity picking up in a material way and prices at last stabilising. However it is important to remember that the lack of supply has been as important in underpinning prices as the rise in demand. With the economic backdrop still quite uncertain, unemployment is set to continue increasing sharply and finance for first time buyers is still in short supply, there are a number of significant obstacles for the market to overcome.”

  • Recession
  • Credit crunch
  • Retail industry
  • Economics
  • Green shoots
  • Property
  • House prices
  • Consumer affairs
guardian.co.uk ? Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Defendants must help pay own legal fees, government announces

Monday, June 8th, 2009

Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/jun/08/legal-aid-defendants-representation

• Means-testing will help cut legal aid, say ministers
• Critics fear plans will lead to miscarriages of justice

Defendants in some serious criminal ­trials including cases of murder, manslaughter and rape will have to contribute to their own legal fees under plans announced by the ­government today .

Plans for means-testing in the crown courts will require those with a disposable income of more than £3,398 to contribute towards their legal representation, prompting claims that the reforms will lead to miscarriages of justice.

The government says the plans, which come into force in January, will save up to £25m from the legal aid budget. But critics say they will compromise the rights to a fair trial and to legal representation.

“Means testing will fundamentally undermine access to justice for those who are unable to afford it and are frequently innocent,” the group Young Legal Aid Lawyers said. “The proposals appear to be taking our justice system one step closer to a two-tier approach – the socially excluded and vulnerable individuals who are most likely to fall into the criminal justice system are being offered limited access to justice and a second-rate service.”

Figures show that about 46% of defendants are found innocent after a trial, while 41.9% have a gross annual income under £10,000, and 70% have an income below the national average.

“The proposed cut-off from entitlement is set at a level which excludes … too great a proportion of crown court defendants and this will cause hardship,” said the Bar Council.

But the government said the plans would lead to significant savings. “The government strongly believes that those convicted of a crime, and who have been ordered to make a contribution, should pay some or all of the cost of their publicly funded defence,” said Lord Bach, the justice minister in charge of legal aid.

However, the Bar Council questioned whether the reforms would lead to real savings. “The trials that take place in the crown court are not as short and straightforward as those in the magistrates court,” it said. “There is concern that the costs of administering the scheme have been understated, and therefore the proposed savings figures are over-optimistic.”

The reforms come two years after a similar scheme was introduced in magistrates courts, which deal with lesser offences. Critics say this has already prevented some defendants from accessing legal representation.

“The income level at which significant contributions will be required from defendants and their families is cripplingly low,” Young Legal Aid Lawyers said. “This is not a scheme designed simply to make very wealthy defendants pay.”

Peter Loder, chairman of the Criminal Bar Association, said: “It is sensible for those who can afford it to contribute towards their legal representation. But … we fear the system they are envisaging means that people will simply not have that representation.”

  • Criminal justice
  • Law
  • Consumer affairs
guardian.co.uk ? Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

What Types of Content are Good For Building Blog Traffic

Monday, June 8th, 2009

The main key to generating blog income is traffic. If you can double your traffic, your blog income can possibly be double as well. As long as the visitors keep on coming, your blog gives monetary gains. More visitors mean more ad clicks, more donations if you ask for in your blog, more affiliate sales and more leads.

How to build good traffic with content?

Create valuable content: Provide your users with valuable content. Try and improve the quality of the content as frequently as you can. Expand the people’s thoughts, actions and their awareness. Strong content is usually valued as long as it generates long term referral traffic. Quality is more important than quantity. So be careful in doing the needful.

Create original content: even though it takes efforts to produce original content, it is a good strategy for long term planning. If people like one of the articles, that is basically the writing style, they may also be interested in others. If someone reads content from a single person, it is bound to create awareness and much interest. Even though original content takes some time in building the traffic, it lays a solid long lasting foundation.

Create timeless content: It is not necessary to write on current topics. You can even write on the older ones as long as they attract viewers. These articles will be available even after we are long gone. In traffic building, timeless content is for much longer time than the time bounded content.

Write what you actually believe in: writing in something which you do not believe will not be fruitful as you will not put your full self into it. Being honest with yourself and also with the viewers of your blog is very important strategy, and will definitely attract more and more traffic. Sometimes you will be praised, sometimes criticized, but do not lose hope as one day you will succeed.

Treat your visitors well: Do not write stuff that will go against any ones religion or personal life, at least if it affects him/her. Do not humiliate others at the cost of your writing. Treat your viewers as real human beings.

Am I too old for an internship?

Friday, June 5th, 2009

Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2009/jun/05/work-and-careers-advice

Problems at work? Our agony uncle has the answer


How will it look if I become an intern after a seven-year career?

A couple of months ago my company closed some offices and departments to cut costs, including my department. I have had a few interviews for similar roles since then, but no offer has been made yet. All feedback points to the same problem: I lack commercial experience. I have never worked with external clients – my old role was about providing services for internal stakeholders – and I now understand this is valuable experience that I need if I?want to open up my job options.

When I realised this, I identified the best companies in my sector and knocked on their doors asking for an ­internship. I have been offered an eight-week stint at a reputable company working with big-name clients. It has promised I will be involved in projects and meetings with clients. I?have no doubt this will give me experience of client-focused environments, and the confidence to perform better in job interviews.

This is an important investment of time and money (I will earn nothing in this position) so I really want to make the most of it. My concern is, how can I fit this internship into my CV? After a professional career of more than seven years, it will look odd if I place my internship as the most recent position I have held. Will this deter any potential employers from shortlisting me?

You’ve shown admirable resilience and initiative. To apply for an internship after seven years of a professional career displayed an optimism bordering on the unrealistic: yet it worked. There’s no question you must snap it up, and I’m sure that’s what you intend to do.

As far as your CV goes, you need to construct it in a slightly unorthodox way. Rather than listing your internship as your most recent experience (which I agree could look a bit curious), you should highlight it at the start with an explanation of why it was necessary, very much as you’ve explained it to me. I don’t know your age, but a paragraph headed along the lines of Why Did a 30-Year-Old Professional Welcome an Internship? tackles the issue head on and presents it positively. All other things being equal, this should get you through to the interview stage. Indeed, some employers will mentally give you high marks for having shown such determination and enterprise.

It’s worth wondering, too, just why this reputable company with important clients agreed to take on such an unconventional intern. It’s unlikely to be pure philanthropy. They must be at least a little intrigued by your background and character. Those eight weeks present you with a golden opportunity to show that you could be of more permanent value to them.

I’m not suggesting that you should be pushy; just that you should leap at any chance to show your usefulness, which could involve calling on your experience as a provider of internal services. A promising, client-facing executive with a good understanding of internal administration could be an attractive prospect for the company.

All that may be a little too much to hope for. But there’s no doubt at all that, if you make the most of your internship, it will greatly increase your confidence and your chances; and it will provide potentially telling evidence of your strength of character.


Demand for bonus fee from business advisers is hard to justify

I run a small design consultancy. At the start of the year I decided to streamline our business practices, knowing we needed more work. I was approached by a group of business specialists who claimed to be able to improve my business exponentially in return for a fixed monthly amount plus a “bonus fee” paid on achieving the increase.

I didn’t believe the “exponential” part but we were pretty desperate for work so I signed up for a two-month trial. Most of the business advice was useful and imaginative. As luck would have it, two of our existing clients had new projects so the need for other work was not quite so desperate – just as well, because my business advisers manifested neither the introductions nor additional business they claimed.

Then the “bonus fee” contract was presented. Above an amount of turnover defined as “more than I would have generated without their advice”, I would be required to pay 25%. There was no mention of affordability – supposing my profit margin on the extra turnover was 20%, I would still be required to pay the 25%, resulting in a loss. On this basis I cancelled the contract. Currently it looks like my business is going to survive – the exponential increase isn’t going to happen but I have saved the monthly fees and potentially massive bonus fees. Is such a high percentage common with business interventionists?

You’re well out of this. They expected to be paid for two services: the introduction of new leads or new business and the provision of professional advice. The trouble is, while it’s reasonably easy to calculate the value of the first, it’s quite impossible to do so with the second.

The successful introduction of a new bit of business has a fee attached and it’s customary for whoever introduces it to claim a commission: either a single finder’s fee or a proportion of the additional revenue. No new business, no fee. But nobody knows – and nobody can know – the precise effect on incremental income of professional advice. You found most of it useful and imaginative and it was therefore probably worth the monthly fee. But to demand 25% of some notional gain over what you would have generated without such advice is clearly ludicrous.

With the best will in the world, you couldn’t possibly agree a figure that would make sense to you both.

For Jeremy Bullmore’s advice on a work issue, send a brief email to work@guardian.co.uk. Please note that he is unable to answer questions of a legal nature or reply personally

Readers’ advice

To add to the answer given to the fashion sales manager about whether looking after children full time will damage her career (Dear Jeremy, 23 May). Your situation is very common, and I agree completely with Jeremy’s advice.

Don’t take a lower-scale job unless you need the income. Enjoy your kids, and before you’re ready to go back to work, do a course related to your career. It’s a great way to improve your skills, will look good on your CV, and will demonstrate to employers that you’re serious about what you do.

I took a long break myself and started a part-time MA while still at home. The break and the course have given me a new perspective on work I didn’t have before, and have really helped make me work more effectively. Fabienne Pagnier

Did Jeremy get it right? Email us at work@guardian.co.uk and we’ll print the best reply

  • Work & careers
  • Sectors
  • Forums
guardian.co.uk ? Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds